I had the same problem, the button disappeared and would not come back, so I saved the game and exited, then restarted the game and loaded the saved game and the button was back again and now worked.
I can't get TA Galactopedia to run on my Windows Vista. I got the new GalCiv Ultimate Edition, could there be something about that version that is keeping it from running? Galactopedia will not start, and Windows gives me a message that it will try to find a solution to the problem, but it does not succeed. Anyone else have that problem?
Yes, I am using the TA Galactopedia version, it will not run, Windows Vista gives me an error message saying it will look for a solution to the problem, but it doesn't find one.
Tried to download and use Galactipedia, with my new GalCiv Ultimate Edition, and it will not run. First it was saying it could not find the Resource Type file in the Twilight directory. So I tried adding a copy of that file from Dark Avatar to Twilight, but it still will not start. Could it be because I now use Vista? Haven't played GalCiv in over a year so am not sure about all the changes. Another thing I was wondering about, since I really hate using sp
"EMPIRE FOR SALE" Well, not really "for sale", but available to whoever wants it. Master U, requested that I offer the Empire to whoever may want to run it. To transfer the Darth Nihilus account and control of the Empire, I would need to know what name you would want for the account, your email address and your preferred password. You can email me at [email protected] Otherwise, this is the end of the Empire.
Hi, I'm just curious as to what happened to you guys. It looks like your empire membership was cut in half, and you dropped down to 7th place in one day There have been so many frequent changes made to the way the game is played with all the updates, that for me, it has made the game less enjoyable in order to make it harder for metaverse playe
But no, we don't intend to have options to turn off every last new thing in the game. Okay, guess I won't get it then.
It might be worth adding that option for each of the main new features (turn off unique environments etc) as some of the changes are altering gameplay mssively and there are bound to be players who don't want massive change X but love massive change Y. Personally I'll be playing with everything, but can't hurt to let people tailor their game. <
Will it be possible to turn off the spy feature? This is one element of the game I know I will really dislike, and it may prevent me from purchaseing Dark Avatar.
Lord Reaper can you let me know where is the thread about Frogboy let understand they are regret about Metaverse? I listed one of the threads above, here are two quotes: by frogboy: "If I could see some benefit of the Metaverse, I'd be keen on keeping it. " by: Draginal: "There will absolutely positively not be
There have been comments in other treads but this one has the best examples, not only by frogboy, but also comments by a dev, Brad Wardell, who I think may be the same person since frogboy directly responds to comments made to Brad Wardell and responds as if Brad Wardell's comments were his own. https://forums.galciv2.com/?forumid=164&aid=133988&p=1
The High Command Hegemony just blew both us and the Qourth away fomr out of no where. Qudos to them but I think we need to pick up that pace here. Yes, I noticed that. I think it is just that CraigHB, myself and others have gotten so discouraged. There are so many frequent changes made to the way the game is played with all the updates, that y
I still check the forums from time to time. Is there something I can help you with?
Head On... I cringe at the mention of those commercials... I hate those commercials. There is this doctor who sometimes appears on the FOX news channel and gives advice. Someone asked him about the Head On, product and he said it has no medical value. That it just has some herbal ingrediants. He said that is why they can never actually say i
BTW, there was a poll on v1.3 vs. 1.2 and it was overwhelming that people preferred 1.3 to 1.2. I believe the majority of those, initially preferred it because of the bug fixes, not the game changes. At least that is what most have been saying in the forums. Besides, I thought you said "I don't make games based on committee. I make t
How about making the game in such a way that you wouldn't or couldn't need more than one or two of any given building? I think this was the downfall from the start. Yes, there would obviously be call to add more than one building, such as a factory but you shouldn't "need" fifteen stock exchanges, twenty VR centers... etc. The devs should have built an improvement "cap". T
It would serve you well to remember that you are not their only customer, either. Some of us like the changes they are making and think the older versions were less fun. It would appear that from all the posts by veteran players who share my opinion, that the views I expressed do not represent only one customer. I am done with this debate.
The 'viable' strategies were just ways to break the game. They were easy by definition give that they relied on a loose economy. The 1.4 balance gives both options+scarcity which rewards GOOD players, i.e. those who can maximize the benfits of random tiles, as opposed to the pre 1.3 "I think I'll win this way" approach. Being lucky enough to
Are you really telling that your enjoyment of the game is affected so much if some building has a 10% value or not, Lord Reaper? I find it hard to believe, I doubt you had all those medals if GC2 wouldn't offer something else for you than buildings with numbers I am saying that the combination of game changes since 1.2 have made the game less en
But you're telling the game designer now that they should keep the game unchanged, so that you can "develop your planets the way YOU think you should"... Yes, who is buying and playing the games, the developers or those who are customers? Logic would dictate that the wise business decision would be to please the game players not the developers.
MumbleFratz - given how much spleen was vented about taking out a 10% morale bonus in the stock exchange I can't see how at the same time a +10% increase in morale bonus to the morale buildings is now insignificant. Basically, the 10% from the stock exchange got moved to the proper morale building. Because nobody wants to have to build mult
It does seem as if some idiots in this thread don't remember their earlier complaints that there was no reason to build morale buildings because stock exchanges were too good, and that, post 1.31, stock exchanges were the essential building. No, the complaint was never that the stock exchanges were too good, but that morale buildings were so
Man, I've had it with this. Just when I get used to a change to the game, they do some other nerf that totally changes things. I really don't care if stock exchanges were not supposed to provide a morale bonus. They put it in the game and now they're taking it out almost a year after the game's initial release. And the reason is, "because it wasn't supposed to be there in
I better stop posting about what strategies I use. It's beginning to look like each new update is aimed directly at me to ruin my strategies, and make it more difficult for me to succeed. So I have to keep coming up with new strategies to get around their changes. It is enough to give one a persecution complex. LOL
I'll probably keep mine for defence. Espionage has never really interested me in other games, like the MOO series. It's just another level of micromanagement I can do without. Same here,I always found that to be the least interesting aspect of the MOO series. I also will just use them for defense only as I did in MOO. I view it more as an
