Everybody should always have morals. Certain companies I won't buy games (Not Blizzard fyi) from because I know in the long run it hurts the industry.

Even a good company can produce a bad game that shouldn't be bought.

@OP

I don't really care if you think it's "ok" for me to buy the game or not. Your opinion doesn't affect me. If I decided to never buy games because some random person on the internet found a feature they don't like about it - well, I'd never play a computer game then. My morality is different from yours and I'm not going to alter it to accommodate your thoughts on certain matters.

But they're not asking if they should play it.  They're asking if it's ok for OTHER PEOPLE to play it.  And why wouldn't it be?

Why should everyone share the same values on this?  I understand, you know, killing, stealing, raping, totally immoral.  Buying games with an always on connection...umm, no.

Pick something you think is "bad". Lets assume there is a website dedicated to it. Is it ok for people to give money to that website? To visit it? To partake in its content? Or does that make them "bad" too? Is it different for a game that does something "bad" and the people who play it?

Why are you attempting to argue through analogy? It does not help your position, it only muddies the discussion. Argue the point you wish to make instead.

I guess it's no secret by now that I'm Christian.  As far as I'm concerned, morals are morals.  They are etched in stone, part of our universe, just like the law of gravity is.  It may not always be obvious what they are, but neither is the behavior of a top quark particle. 

Now, enter gaming:  what morals exactly are we talking about?   Pirating a commercial game and playing for free against the publisher's wishes I think everyone can say is immoral.  Playing an evil character and slaughtering angels, pixies, peasants, etc. I think most everyone would say is not immoral.  Not really.  It's a game.  Mercilessly killing the common people is kinda funny, actually. 

Paying real money for a Stone of Justice in Diablo 2 I think is kind of a grey area.  In my view, if you're doing that sort of thing on Blizzard's servers then Blizzard gets to say whether that is moral or not.  If they say, "players caught trading items for real money will be banned", then if you do it that is immoral.  But if they say nothing at all, it's their server, their game, their game rules.  If it's not banned then it's permitted.

If 100 million young people purchase product x that you think is bad/wrong..and play it..and it becomes successful so that 300 million more people buy and play it...doesnt what was originally considered "bad" become the status quo? And what was right now become pase or wrong.

If gamers have morals, are they required to act on them less said morals be decayed and go extinct? If we are the "parents" of gaming should we just respect the childs mistakes or correct them? 

If your values say something is wrong..and you ignore them and just move on with your life...do you have values? Is it enough just to say you have them or are they a product of actions not words? And if do have values can they be about games or are games too trivial to have values about?

I don't fault anyone if they choose not play a particular game for whatever reason.  I'll even listen to the reason for not playing a particular game.  What I won't do is refuse to play a game because of someone else's belief.  Do I like the always on DRM of Diablo 3?  Nah.  Do I still enjoy the game?  Yup.  Am I going to boycott activation/blizzard because of their decision to have that drm?  No.  Honestly, I don't care that much and don't find myself all that violated by an annoying restriction that potentially cuts down on piracy or preserves the integrity of the game (item drops, etc). 

I think the problem with the OP is how intentionally vague it is.  Talking about the morality of an always on the internet requirement is well.. silly.  What does that have to do with morality or "values?" 

If you have something specific to talk about, please do so - specifically - and perhaps we can all have a more interesting conversation. 

Laws are the byproduct of a democracy where three wolves and a sheep vote on what's for dinner....

I did not thought?  

Grammer aside, I was answering a post that you chose not to include in your quote.

You're welcome.

I'm not sure what you're driving at.  I stand by what I said.  I donate time and/or money to the political parties that I choose to.  I also donate time, money or endorsements to various activists if they suit me.  For instance, I'm straight, but I support gay marriage.  I support our rights to own and bear arms.  If you think that's wrong, I don't care.  

The post I responded to was asking if it's right for others to donate to a site that I thought was wrong.  I don't think it's my call to determine that for someone else.  I also don't think it's anyone else's call to determine that for me.

Essentially, my money and time is mine.  Yours is yours.  You have no say in what I do with mine, regardless of what you consider moral.  i have no say in what you do with yours, regardless of my morals.  

Is that difficult to grasp?