Sup Com 2 - No thank you

OMG_Pa1nk1ller

Join Date 07/2009

Sup Com 2 - No thank you

I just got full version of sup com 2 and I really disapointed about it.

Graphic:

You may not belive it but in my opinion C&C generals (released 2003) looked a lot better then this game. I cannot think of any other RTS released in last 3 years which looks so poor. I would even say Earth 2150 have more unique and richer graphics then this game (released 2000) (LINK).

Sound:

Its there, nothing really thriling. Voice acting not great at all.

Gameplay:

Quite simple you get 2 resources to collect and research points to develop fev technologies. Only new and not seen before thing is that every fraction get mech like unit that playes role of comander. This unit can be developed into quite devastating force, but if its get killed game is over. Except that there is nothin new or thrilling or ground breaking features.

Plot/Storyline

Shallow, almost non existend

Final thoughts

The reason why I am making this post is simple. I want to warn anyone who is thinking to spend 50 USD for this game. IT IS NOT WORTH IT. Down of war 2 is now 25 USD and its so much advanced and enjoyable game then this one, even anny of C&C titles from last 8 years will be better investment then this.

Seems GPG started to mass produce half finished games hoping to get quick buck and jump into next title. The way they butchered Demigod I tought they will learn their lesson but Sup Com 2 is yet another exaple that we can't expect much from them anymore. Dont get wrong I really enjoyed Dungeon Siege II and spend many hours playin but even now it still has bugs that can make the game impossible to finish (after 5 years from release!!!). Space siege wasnt really briliant either.

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

Quoting SwerydAss,

reply 50

Also I would like to add the number one reason I like supcom 2 over the first one is the units are alot stronger than the first. It was like the units in the first one were made out of paper.. That was also my gripe with Red Alert 3.

supcom isnt about units. its about armies.

Successfully updated karma reason!

thats because their land units can go over water!!!!!

No $h1t. My point was that that took away a third of their units and furthermore the diversity of the factions which are pretty much interchangeable now with the exception of the tech tree.

supcom isnt about units. its about armies.

Well put.

Successfully updated karma reason!

If they were interchangeable then they all would have hover units and no navy. The real differences now are in the experimentals anyway. I do agree that it is about armies but if the whole army is made of paper units it makes the army feel like paper too. It would be nice if each faction had a different superweapon instead of just nukes. And I'm not trying to say that this is the best rts either.. I think its decent and only bought it because no other base building rts will be coming out for at least 3-6 months.... Starcraft 2 will be better even thought I'm a little upset with that one with the very few changes they made unit wise with 12 years to think of new ones. I do want them to stay with the formula they have I just think they could of thought of more tweaks in that time. And the fact the first installment of SCII only has only the marine campaign...Doesn't matter I can play SoaSe and EU3 a million times more before I'm bored anyway.

Successfully updated karma reason!