Thxxx for the link to the Women Gamer's article. I particularly liked this part :
« EA has a reputation. They are a megalithic corporate entity with the bureaucratic structure that goes with it, as attested to not only by a myriad of ‘bad experience’ consumers over the years but also by those who have partaken of employment there. »
Recently, I did not purchase their SPORE game because of its very intrusive (and potentially
) form of DRM programme : an "advanced" form of SecuROM.
I knew that if I had any serious problem with Spore, EA Tech Support would be totally useless (and clueless) : 
Recently, I experienced an issue with Impulse, and an officer of StarDock Tech Support (IamDean) saw my post, on the forum, and he took the intitiative of guiding me through some troubleshooting steps -- which resulted in fixing the issue. I never had to contact SD Tech Support : it came to me, on the forum !
EA Tech Support << and >> StarDock Tech Support are the total, polar opposites -- in terms of customer care & problem-solving efficiency.
My family owns 5 EA titles (still installed) : BFME 1, BFME 2 + WitchKing expansion, C&C 3 + expansion. But their copy-protection scheme is far less problematic than the one EA is using to "defend" Spore.
(What a "defense" : Spore, in September, has been illegally downloaded, by torrent, somewhere between ½ & ¾ million times !)
StarDock's Impulse, taking into account that it is a relatively new programme, is much more trustworthy than the EA Download Manager -- which does not come with any significant tech support !