MacsenLP

10 turns construction is way too long. 5 turns would be more reasonable. Also I think they should be destroyed once used. Surviving the death of a star doesn't make much sense.

[quote]seems to only happen for me if I've alt-tabbed out of the game at some point.[/quote] Dzhel, after some testing I'm pretty sure your right. Just gotta hope Stardock fix it now I guess.

[quote]I've also seen this bug around for a long time but it really seems to only happen for me if I've alt-tabbed out of the game at some point. If I don't, I never seem to get that CTD. I could be imagining things but thought I'd put it out there.[/quote] Thanks for reply. I usually alt-tab during my games at some point so I'll keep it in mind. I've been avoiding going to the ship details screen to avoid the crashes so next time I won't to see if your alt-tab theory is right. <b

Example: My diplomacy=70 Thalan diplomacy-20 The thalans have -1 in the foreign report screen for diplomacy when it should be +1 as my diplomacy is vastly better than theres. I think the diplomacy stat being a minus is creating the bug if say there diploamcy stat was +10 then the realations would def be +1 even though -20 is of course worse. Prob badly worded :) hope the devs understand.

CTD when you try to look at pretty revolving oppenent ship details screen maybe 1 out of 5 attempts. This bug has been around for ages I'm pretty sure it's in DA as well it's really starting to irk me so I thought id post it. Anyone else experiencing this annoying bug? Extra details don't know if helpful: My graphics card is NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS fully updated drivers according to NVIDIA website (non beta driv

Looks like friday afternoon/evening for beta at best unless there doing a late shift tonight a week thursday release would be very dissapointing.

thx 4info rls699.

[quote]well they`ll tell us soon what is going on !![/quote] Feels about as likely as asking God for a sign and being given one at the moment but I admire your optimism. Is kryo working today or did he catch brads flu, or is he out of the loop on the beta schedule anyway I wonder.

[quote]I'm just trying to goad someone from StarDock into posting something. Anything. Now, it is obvious to Me that I was hinting that StarDock should either do what they promised to do, or provide some type of statement that communicates their intent to give us an update on their current schedule to keep us informed on any future plans to do what they promised to do in the first place. I apologize if I failed to effectively communicate that subtile intent in a sufficiently obvious ma

[quote]~in his most Stardockian authoritative voice~ There shal not be a beta patch today. Believe that, or just assume there is no beta tonight and be surprised whenever it does come. Turn on SDC tomorrow morning and see if it came... This may also just be my stance on Thursday releases as Thursday's are booked for my attention to other things lol.[/quote] Your here posting, in the same thread as I am waiting for the beta. Where both in the same boat although I don't think yo

[quote]Would knowing now really affect your life that much?[/quote] Could be spending time doing more constructive things rather than reading this site hoping for a response... yes. :)

[quote]Still no news?[/quote] Earth to Stardock... anyone there? kryo, cari, brad... anyone?

[quote]I'm making a sticky thread to keep you guys updated on when we plan to release another beta.[/quote] Is there a beta out out today (ie thursday afternoon/evening US eastern time). Thursdays tend to be the beta release days in the past i've noticed.

[quote]Is there any chance that the new beta will be released before next Thursday?[/quote] New eta on the beta would be nice Stardock.

[quote]We meant to get Beta 5 out this week[/quote] Sorry to hear your ill. So is beta 5 out later today, next week or you don't know yet? If the AI ship design feature is slowing down the release of the beta personally id rather it waited to beta 5b.

Any news on the beta Stardock? edit: that isn't new ynglaur

Thx loupdinour I missed that.

[quote]Damn, it would appear that no update shall be forthcoming today. Ah, well! One less distraction, I suppose...[/quote] I could do with the distraction personally. Any news Stardock?

[quote]10/8 hit points[/quote] I've had this happening all the time the 1st hit point number should never be larger than the second I believe im right in thinking.

[quote]The Arceans simply are not competitive in my opinion.[/quote] Theres more reason to believe that since the beta that introduced the speed changes. They now are no doubt extremely weak in the the colonisation phase so any map with a high planet setting they will no doubt struggle with. Before the speed changes I felt they were one of the strongest races in general the AI has big problems tackling 1st strike ability. They were very strong colonisers you could get speed 4

I would give you a really good reply but stopped reading your post cos my eyes are bleeding due to lack of paragraphs. Try posting it again with paragraphs please.

[quote]Personally; I would far prefer the rule to be removed, if ships mutually destroy each other then so be it.[/quote] Got my vote.

[quote]It was not intended so. Quite some time ago Brad wrote this will not be possible, but obviously when they coded the game, they forgot to implement it.[/quote] Shame they still havn't implemented it. Losing the odd election would be fun.

[quote]In TA, as I understand the current beta versions, "Concepts of Malice" does not appear in at least some tech trees, even after selecting an evil alignment. Meaning that at least some of the races can never get Mind Control Centers unless the enabling tech has been changed (in particular playing an evil race with the Drath tech tree I was unable to find Concepts of Malice as an available tech anywhere... although there are sooooo many other wonderful things). In fact, I am not certain _any

[quote]Destroyed mining bases still show delivery lines to planet[/quote] Seen this in my game too. Me Iconians destroyed mines by me=Korx.