FROOKIE

@ Amenostep - Since you are not going to be able to reply to this, cos it seems you are just plain running away after attempting to get the last word in, I am not going to break your arguments into itty bitty pieces, The simple fact is that there are things we can do to improve the situation: As people we need to rely less on our cars. conserve energy wherever we can, and be more green. if you don't know how, read up on it and I'm sure you'll be able to get a decent idea. As f

You need to look up an article in Scientific American on dinosaur extinction. December of... 2002? 2003? Wasn't long before 2004... The main theory it presented is that the dinos simply suffocated to death. The evidence involved has a lot to do with a peculiarity of how Earth's atmosphere works. Apparently, volcanos provided most of the oxygen in the atmosphere. As the vol

The continual doexyfication of the Earth that is contributing to it we pretty much can't stop. In order to do so, we need to drastically increase Earth's tectonic acticity. This means we need volcanos to erupt more often than they do. We can do temporary fixes, of course. By temporary, I mean drilling a hole to the center of the planet and firing a nuke into it. That would

@ FROOKIE Im not an american... shame on you for lumping me in with them! Oops-me and my big brush!. . The pragamtic aspect woul

This is all really, really interesting. Honestly, I'm enthralled. What is you americans call it? Oh, yeah..Highbrow stuff . . Okay somebody must know this one then...What is outside the universe? Is it nothing ness? less than vacuum? And if the universe is expanding and nothing is outside it, then the universe may be expanding at an extremely high velocity. Higher than c? Also, if the

hate to point it out but the game already has fighters and carriers(sort of) I'm sorry, but you're going to have to explain that particular statement. esp. the bit about carriers. That having been said, along

As for the rest of you arguing semantics about "theory" , "hypthothesis", let's just say you guys should do a bit more reading about the philisophy of the scientific method first before shooting your mouth off. Consider me suitably chastised... . My god ri

with these ideas it doesnt seem like there would be any use for huge or large ships. If you were fighting against a carrier what would the computor target first, the carrier or the ships? You again. Well its up to you how to play this one. If the carrier is still heavily armed then it should be attacked first, if not then the battle

The main thing from this is that even though there may be a universe full of it it WILL run out eventually (unless it can renew itself). The universe is infinite, anything which takes up 90% of the mass of an infinite...er, construct is going to be infinite if my maths is correct. don't worry about it running out. I think the real problem is that if

Actually, you are both right and wrong. A theory is a hypothesis. However, a hypothesis is not necessarily a theory. A hypothesis must be testable and suffiently peer reviewed without being proven false, in order to become a theory. Yeah I'll go with that. Hey marcanthonas! lets not split hairs - truc

I'm well up for Tak in The GC universe, but you need to calm down, ole buddy. BTW you should have posted on game talk as this particular subject is way way 'on topic'. Oh and don't worry about the opposition, they is just not really happy about being the vocal minority. init. Also give it another go, but this time leave out the invective, its unnecessary. If you are really a fan of Tak then you should know that this kind of post never helps the cause. IMO you ain

No. God is not a theory, but a hypothesis. There is not enough proof of a God to make him an accepted theory No, god is a beleif. Beleif requires no proof, and with this I can say that "god exists" as my pet theory theory. <TD class="mb-Bod

Not really, it's generally accepted by the cosmologic community that dark matter and dark energy account for the "missing stuff" in the equations. Not only does it account for mass and energy, but it also accounts for forces and explains why galaxies don't just spin into dissipation. They say, "It's there, we just can't find it yet." So its a

if i'm afraid the whole dark matter issue is still just a theory. Its a theory that fits the data, but that is all that it is. The dark matter apple hasn't yet fallen on stephen hawkins' head yet.

And the citizens still have 20% of their income to use for whatever else they want. So, what is there to complain about? Pardon? if my government tried to siphon off 79% of my income , i'd move out. But its only a game so don't mind me. (i'd still not be happy if anyone of you was in a position of power) <img src="http://

LOL. So if I was playing in a MP game, and i hacked my game to give me extra bonuses, I wouldn't be cheating? hi richrf, as long as you told the other player you would do so, and they agreed to continue to play with you, then it is not cheating. But if you did it on the quiet then it would be cheating. Fair?

would sell my mom for a Battle Fleet Gothic tactical game.[/qoute] I wouldn't sell my mum...but its a close call nonetheless! Anyway peeps soon there will be sword of the stars and space empires 5 to kick around with.

I say there cheating! Thats's my opinion. Wow, guess you showed us eh? Try this for size: When a person gives an opinion without any validation whatsoever (and no! the evil smiley does not count) the opinion becomes useless, like a fart in high wind, p

2) What is the highest AI level that doesn't cheat? cheat? oh you mean the bonuses given to the AI...Cheating is only applicable if there is a hidden game mechanic reserved for AI's alone which would give them lets say... 1) An instant armada if they lose a load of ships 2) If they run out of cash they get a few million credits<

After you figure out how to beat the Tactical A.I after a few days,there seems little else the game has to offer. Pretty bold statement, ashberry, so you stopped playing gc2 now you cracked it? I'm quite looking forward to sword of the stars, The Tak element will hopefully be good and maybe they'll get the strategic side to be deep a

you heartless monsters. Whats this i hear about 79% tax rates. I hope you guys never get into positions of power!

see MOO3 regarding unneeded tinkering destroying a classic space game series. Amen to that. What a waste of a mega-franchise. Do you reckon they even played the game themselves? Personally i reckon they hired my companies new business team for a few days to beta test the game ( A bunch of useless data inputers who still don't know where their b

I'm looking forward to space empires 5. I definitely need the diverse options that space empires is promising. And its crossed fingers for a decent AI.

like your style shyang, thats the kind of Tak that GC2 should have been shipped with in the first place.

apocalypse is tougher generally