Computers aren’t any good with tactics, it’s the number crunching they kick you with. But what if they were? What if it was great, a real challenge. Maybe you got to the point where you let te computer handle things, because you couldn't take the strain? Man that would be heaven! Actually
Wow, nice essay! So what is it you want improved upon exactly. I've read your post twice now and i think i'm with you now. The resources are simplified version of governors/admirals from moo2, but in GC2 you can make them better in time. I have to agree with you on the wormhole issue, sort of, i tend to avoid those ones and pick up others instead, if poss. (are you a startrek voyager fan or something???)
Seems like the horse i've been flogging aint so dead after all... I thought the bland attack/defense system, limited tech tree, and simplistic ship design would make for a rather dull tactical combat unless they changed the whole tech tree, ship design, and fleet system. Surely not th
Most of the advances in the last 10 years have been purely cosmetic - Better graphics etc., i'm talking gameplay-wise .... mostly. All I want is for it to be included as a choice, and seeing as its such a major change i am willing: a: to pay full price for it b: and also get bashed by people who disagree
like a lot of people out there i have played moo2 and really liked it. (I failed one of my modules at uni because of Moo2, still don't regret it though). Galciv 2 on the other hand might well have cost me my degree! This is a superior game to moo2 for a number of reasons which i'll go into, but i want to make this statement first: "I think that having tactical combat included into the game would make GC2 possibly the best game ev
