*INHALE*
Do you believe in UFO's/Alien visiting Earth?
believe in aliens 100%, visiting Earth? not as sure
Do you think there was a UFO crash in Roswell (area 51)?
not really, think it was secret gov tech
If so, why do you think the goverment is hiding it?
hypothetically? for their own purposes, duh.
oh, and to keep ignorants, religious
freaks (not pious people in general), radicals, democrats, stargazers, scientists etc. rioting in the streets. they all have their reasons
-Because of the technology to produce energy without oil will crash the economics world wide. So unless we we run out of oil soon it wont happen because they are money hungry.
I dont see how replacing oil would crash the economy. it would only dump some buisness, boost others, and longevitize the fabrication industry
-Maybe because ppl around the world would panic, and therefor releasing just a small amount at a time, so ppl will get used to the idea that they are here.
a lot of people would panic, its a fair concept.
not everyone, but a lot of people
-It could be because the US goverment wants the technology for themself, and if a war really would break out on US ground, they would have a huge advantage.
true, but we already have that massive advantage.
Take, for example, the classic "old fogey" stereotype, which is based in the simple fact that anyone elderly without specific, special, and in depth training tends to simply not understand how computers work. Or high level electronics in general. This horrific fact is further compounded by the fact that the elderly generation is over represented int he voting and governing areas. Our elders tend to vote more than the younger generation, as well as being the ones who tend to get elected to high office.
amen.
I just don't see people panicking just because an alien species has been visiting
really?
well what about nuclear technology, an amazing, relatively clean beautiful technology.
people are scared shitless of it.
Well, it would crash the economies of very oil dependent countries, so in turn the US and maybe some European ones also China and India. So I guess you could be right.
how would the crash of saudi arabia and kuwait affect first world countries?
I doubt we have been able to figure out how all of it works though, and who says that the crashed vesel even has weapons. If it is purely scientifical then I doubt it would. Who knows the aliens could even be peaceful or something.
Plus, reverse engineering takes a while, and usually only works if you are trying to counter the weapon not copy it.
true o the last, true to the third, true to the second. I dont believe true to the first, it would take a while but it would eventually happen.
I really don't think it matters if aliens exist or not, if they can travel to our planet without being noticed by private space watchers and whatnot, then there is absolutely nothing we can do to defend ourselves.
true...
I have no idea what human flesh tastes like, I have tried to bite myself but apparently your body has a natural reflex that wont allow you to bite into your arm far enough to tare into the flesh and muscle.
ah, so you do have issues

I also believe they think waay different then us, sorta like if we were living in a 2D world and they are trying to tell us they are in a 3D world. Heres a small video that shows abit what i mean.
So just because we dont know its there, doesnt mean it doesnt exists
unless they actually percieve the world as a different set of dimensions (or a different configuration) (in which case we probably couldnt directly interact with them) they still would have a thought process we could somehow interface with, it would just be like speaking a different language on a MUCH tougher scale.
(erm i cant remember the word)
progress
I more believe they are concerned with our way we treat our planet and destroy our selfs with weapons. The weapons in space are a really big concern to them. They have even stopped some test missles that were to be tested on the moon surface.
but that would be like someone stepping in on two ant colonies fighting and saying "stop, for the humanity of it all!" which doesnt make sense for two reasons... I'll let you guess
So no weapons, but the technology to produce unlimited energy from nothing could be used for alot things like weapons of sorts.
true, although we would have problems making it effective
Doesn't matter if it has weapons or not. The simple fact is anything is a weapon, if you view it right, and advanced technology -- even if it isn't in itself a weapon -- will carry with it the concepts and principles it was built on, which can be turned into a weapon. Lets take a complete non-weapon, say the ability to build airplanes. They are not designed as, or meant to be, weapons. Yet one only has to look at 9/11 to realize they can be twisted into them.
true, some things are better weapons then others
you're starting to remind me of the toran (?) in stargate.
Thats my point Problem is, there are far too many ignorant people, and the faster technology moves, the more that will be true.
amen
"Free from interference" isn't "free from policing". I'm thinking about how stuff like P2P file transfer has gotten turned into a way too spread such things as child porno, as well as the fact that eventually "cyber crime" is going to become a much more serious issue as we put our lives more and more in the hands of networked computers. Not just banking or mail orders, but GPS navigators, cell phones, airplanes, air control systems, the list goes on. Imagine the havoc if someone disables the ability for a given cell service to call 911, caused street lights to show green both ways, or even the (relatively) non-malicious act of causing GPS navigation systems to steer people onto more densely packed roads and highways.
played a few too many megaman games...
but in general your principle is true, until we develop subspace internet, duh.
There arent many people in the world that really do understand how they work, like actually understand. Sure everyone here has the basic idea of their mechanics, but the fact of the matter is computers will outexceed our capacity to think and process in less then a decade, and in 15 years it will double or triple that same capacity. Rarely do humans design computers now, we leave it to the computers to design better computers.
several things
1) the computer is far to non-compact to even rival the human brain, yes it can process numbers amazingly well, but processing in general will not be completed by computers at our speed at our level of detail, its physically impossible as the mind is far more micro-scaled and complex.
2) who cares about "most people", I'm not one of them.

3) ever heard the saying "if the brain was so simple that it could be understood, we would be so simple we couldnt."?
my general point being: Until there is an amazing revolution in computers that turns the CPU into a MUCH smaller machine (think nanoscale for our current duo cores) that also doubles as RAM, hardrive is shrunk to many times smaller with countless multitudes of more gigabites (I dont know the word for 1000 gigabites, curse it), and the video card is much more advanced and
integrated. and all of this fits in about the size of two knuckles, it will never be as fast or as capable as the human brain. besides, the surface area drives processing capacity while the area decides speed (smaller the better)
besides, we dont trust computers to do designing, we do designing while computers do number crunching.
I wasn't speaking in terms of actual mechanical functioning, I'm talking about the practical how they work. For example, my grandfather is complaining that I'm eating up all his bandwidth and making his computer access various websites slow. This isn't true, my computer isn't sending / recieving packets constantly enough (or at a fast enough rate) for me to be eating up anywhere near the maximum bandwidth of a cable internet service (I've had up to 4 downloads run at 150+ KB/s, limited not by my cable speed but by the other guys speed). What is, in fact, going on (as far as I can tell) is that something about the way the router is set up is increasing (vastly) his latency. I can't tell, because he's scared that running tracert will somehow damage his computer.
my grandma bought an amazing computer, understands nothing of it.

your grandfather impresses me.
the technology to produce unlimited energy from nothing
You're joking, right? You cannot produce energy from nothing, basic physics there
ok, I'm going to side with Lugge here, with the exclusion that you CAN pull from other dimensions, which would appear to be "nothing" to us.
lol, remember that there are equations that make standard physics fly out the window.
yes, there is a term commonly used with them
"bunk"
See... now you bring up an interesting point. This is our basic physics, and in the scope of everything left to be discovered they might as well not exist.
as with everything in physics, principles are expanded upon, not discarded.
For space travel to be viable you would need to go faster then the speed of light, meaning that you would need infinite energy, or a way to produce infinite energy and not need an infinite amount of stuff, or take something already infinite that has barely nothing and harness it. I dont know I might just be rambling, but I think there si a way to produce energy out of nothing. Maybe out of something, but it would be much less large then infinity, maybe even a lesser infinity.
everything of our knowledge says that there really isnt a "nothing", so there goes that point anyhow

as for getting something to exceed its bound up energy... I dont personally believe its possible, a way to get energy conversion to damn near 100% mass to energy, maybe, but I think that energy always must come from something else, whether that be the fabric of timespace, or a parallel dimension, or dilbert comics etc. etc.
try shrooms.
is that a consumer's endorsment