Search
Forum Home | Login
DocDVD
DocDVD
Join Date 03/2003
+5

Subspace Blasters weaker than Disruptors?

February 28, 2006 8:01:43 AM from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
I just researched the complete Beam Weapon Tech tree and noticed that Subspace Blasters (which are researched after Disruptors) are weaker than the lower tech weapons?

Disruptors III Size 5, Cost 70 Damage 8
Subspace Blaster Size 6 Cost 60, Damage 6

is that correct???
Locked Post
Search this post
Advanced Search
Subscription Options
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
Malkuth
Join Date 11/2003
+1
Reply #1 February 28, 2006 8:41:04 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
Have never been that far in Beam before so not sure. They are cheaper though, maybe for some odd reason they scale and do more damage as they go up more?

Really though surprised you been that high, usually buy the time I get to that point the game is over for me.. And the AI rules.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
Lord KiRon
Join Date 06/2003
0
Reply #2 February 28, 2006 8:58:51 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
And TriStronium Armor II have exactly same stats as Stristronium armor I.
Bugs I guess...
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
Corban
Join Date 05/2004
0
Reply #3 February 28, 2006 8:59:38 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
A more accurate comparison would be between Disruptors III and Subspace Blaster III. My 'guess' would be the size of of SB III would be 4 or 3, allowing you to fit more weapons of that type on the vessel.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
Nastavnik
Join Date 03/2003
0
Reply #4 February 28, 2006 9:17:56 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
And TriStronium Armor II have exactly same stats as Stristronium armor I.
Bugs I guess...


Doesn't it take on less space in the ship? That would be better
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
BMSMCMAM
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #5 February 28, 2006 9:19:09 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
That wouldn't be more accurate. That'd mean you would be using up tons of research points just to get a weapon that equals Disrupter III, wasting points that could be used for better improvements.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
DocDVD
Join Date 03/2003
+5
Reply #6 February 28, 2006 9:39:50 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
A more accurate comparison would be between Disruptors III and Subspace Blaster III. My 'guess' would be the size of of SB III would be 4 or 3, allowing you to fit more weapons of that type on the vessel.


Well, there are no Subspace Blasters III (or II), the next is the Doom Ray..
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
DocDVD
DeviousToast
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #7 February 28, 2006 10:04:24 AM
from Stardock ForumsStardock Forums
Perhaps it's sort of a "We reached a dead end with these lasers. The next laser won't be as good, but there's this DOOM RAY we're working on, that'll blow the current stuff out of the water." That would be like... real life scientific research. Not everything progresses constantly up with no back-tracking.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
View all recent posts
Mark all posts as read Delete cookies created by the forum Return to Top
Stardock Forums v        Server Load Time:   Page Render Time:
About us | Contacts | Privacy Statement | Register
©1995-2025 Stardock Entertainment. Galactic Civilizations is a registered trademark of Stardock Entertainment. Steam and the Steam logo are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Valve Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. Bank Gothic is a trademark of MyFonts and may be registered in certain jurisdictions. All rights reserved.