It's been 40 years and we're still the only nation to have perfected travel to the moon. Hell, most other countries' space programs are still amateur compared to us.
The F-15 is nothing but a supercharged Americanized MIG, and it's still pretty much one of the best fighters in the world (until they started falling apart), and we only let a few countries have them.
You said that other countries are developing advanced stealth aircraft. Designing. The US has had them operational for over 25 years.
Sigh....some people believe anything they are told.
CVN-68 USS Nimitz Admiral Kuznetsov
Length 332.85 meters 300 meters
Beam 40.84 meters 38 meters
Flight Deck Width 76.8 meters 73 meters
Draft Not Specified 11 meters
And this is only about 20 years after the US made theirs.
Irrelevant. You said nobody else could have it, and they do. You are wrong. Furthermore, it might have been 40 years ago that the Nimitz was build, but it's still the US's top carrier class. The next carrier class isn't even slated to start building for another 7-8 years.
Pakistan has plans for a nuke? You mean only about 50 years after the US had them? (Not to mention the design is less complicated than an F-16).
No, Pakistan exploded a nuclear device several years ago. Again, you said they can't have it, and they do. Time is irrelevant, you are still wrong. Try to keep up. Oh, and keep telling youself that. Arranging a fissionable block to wildcat on command is a lot more complicated than a fly-by-wire aircraft, even if the frame is computer controlled.
You said that other countries are developing advanced stealth aircraft. Designing. The US has had them operational for over 25 years.
Further proof you can't comprehend what you are reading. I never mentioned stealth aircraft. That was someone else.
The F-15 is nothing but a supercharged Americanized MIG, and it's still pretty much one of the best fighters in the world (until they started falling apart), and we only let a few countries have them.
I don't know where this came from, but so what? I contest that it's one of the best in the world. It's the 4th or 5th best fighter in our own fleet. (in certain roles the relatively weak F-117A outdoes it) There are 2 times as many F-16s on duty as F-15s (522 F-15s and 1280 F-16, according to the air force's webpage) and nearly 3 times as many F-18s. ~1400 F-18s is the best estimate I could find. The Russian Su-30 is as manueverable as an F-22, but lacks the speed. The X-31 (experimental) and the F-22 are the only U.S. fighters that can easily execute a J-turn (Herbst manuever) but the Russians have 3 planes that can, the Su-27, the Mig-35 and the Su-30. (The Herbst maneuver is notable in that it involves throwing the plane into a stall) Kinda shoots huge holes in that F-15 superiority, huh?
I mean, seriously, please tell me you think we GAVE the plans for a nuclear weapon to the Soviet Union. Please tell me that, because that's exactly what you said.
Please quote me where I said gave. You can't, because I didn't. I said they had them. Not the same thing as we gave it to them.
The rest of the arguement is systemically useless. The fact of the matter is that technology has been a race between us and the Soviets/Russians since the 50s. You keep bringing up examples of supposed US superiority and how no one else has that technology, and in many cases (not all, but many) you are wrong about that superiority. You also say a lot of what the rest of the world has was not because the US gave it to them. You forget that the Soviets and Russians have always been more generous with their high tech for the right price.
How does that apply to GalCiv? Well you started out saying that you didn't want unique techs traded. Then at one point a dev asked which techs (not unique techs but techs) should be untradable, and you said all of em. Someone asked you why don't you just play with tech trading off, and you tried to backpedal, and say you just meant unique ones. Well, in the rest of your post to me, you talk about how we wouldn't be able to understand what to do with a UFO some alien race might gift to us. So that implies you don't want trading of hulls, engines, sensors or life support techs. Then you talk about how an ancient egyptian couldn't understand a firearm if we could time travel and give it to them. So that shows you don't want weapon tech trading either.
Similar arguments could be made for every branch of the tech tree. So again, I am forced to wonder...why don't you just play with tech trading off? By your own arguments, tech trading lacks any sort of realism no matter HOW the devs limit it, and apparently that really bothers you.