Iam bit tired of these "look how well our game is doing" front page PR hypes, but what do I know about marketing
I could not give rats ass what some review sites think about the game, the real truth comes out in form of user postings @ forums. Also seeing how these review sites give so easily "perfect" scores nowdays it hardy means anything anymore. There are such flaws in GC2 which in my book prevent it making a perfect game, now 4 or 4.5 would be closer to truth. And if you want to nitpick, no mans creation is perfect, how can you give a perfect score to a game then
Sorry for the negativity but this brings back ugly memories. How can a buggy mess of a game like Medieval Total War 2 get same kinda review praising on multiple site while the game was/is bugged to the root and some gameplay aspects are just missing. Or maybe Iam too demanding
Now slap in a real UP, better diplomacy, ground combat and tactical ship battles and I have no problem giving GC2/DA 5/5 score thats all Iam saying. But maybe thats will be with GC3