Personally, when I made the switch from large to huge maps, I found the huge maps to be significantly more difficult. Even more so than the switch from medium to large. The leverage supplied by fast ships is not as destabilizing in a huge map as it is in the smaller maps. I have since found additional other ways of compensating and have become more skilled at setting up massive pre-planned blitzes (Hint: Setup all your ships outside AI space or in "dead zones" inside his space and blitz your ships into position, you will probably get them all placed before the AI declares war on you).

I think players who have "beaten" the game on smaller maps have tended to gravitate up to larger maps in order to increase the difficulty and points (if you are playing metaverse). At least I have...

I agree with almost everything Mumble said above. It should be noted that the developers have said previously that they do not play large maps. They seem to think that those beating large maps are doing things that aren't relevant to smaller maps. I have played medium (25-30 planets) to huge maps (268 planets max) and completely disagree with this. Most techniques used on large maps are even more effective on smaller ones. If I ever decide to move from huge/250 planets up to gigantic/500 planets I expect the game to become more difficult and I am not sure why the developers assume otherwise.

I think people tend to exaggerate the importance of dramatically fast ships. At the end of my last huge game, my transports and warships were running at speed 25 (I believe, running from memory) and that was plenty fast to blitz the computer. The thing here is that the human player is smart enough to put multiple engines on a single ship and gain a speed advantage, while the computer doesn't. Anytime you get ~+5 or more speed on the computer, speed becomes decisive. It doesn't have to be dramatic, just significant. Some nerfing of the engines will only slow this down. To handicap the game sufficiently to stop a human from gaining this advantage would probably wreck the game. It will require a better AI, or something creative like the Yor super-ability.

And back on the main thread, the Yor super-ability seems like a reasonable way to stall out this tactic and would be acceptable to me on my current huge maps, although having it scale slightly based on map size might make sense. AKA something like 2 squares on tiny and 7 squares on gigantic.

One further suggestion for dealing with the one-turn wars that doesn't involve a total nerf of engines:

The problem isn't so much with warships as it is with transports. Currently troop transports can be built to far outstrip the speed of viable warships. I suggest reducing the hull capacity of freighters (possibly in conjunction with an increase in engine size, and a minor decrease in the size of troop, and colony modules to balance out the effect) so that we can't just throw on two advanced troop modules and fill the rest of the hull with engines.

I play on Gigantic galaxies my ships usually max out around 12-15 I prefer to put more guns/armor on my ships and actually fight the enemy... Yes it takes awhile if your trying to go from one side of the galaxy to the other but thats one of the things that makes it feel GIGANTIC.

I say just limit each ship to 3-4 engines each.

There is one big problem with capping engine's in my opinion: Constructors. If you have a vast array of starbases, say economic starbase, that you keep updated as tech develops, it's REALLY FRUSTRATING using slow constructors to do the maintainance. I often make contructors with as many engines as possible so i can get them to a starbase in one turn so i don't have to worry about what constructor of 150 on the board is going to what starbase, and what starbase still needs upgrading, etc... etc...

Deploy aboard an Aircraft Carrier.

You said Carrier... Muhahaha...

Seriously though, I am not going to assume, but if you are with the U.S. Navy sir,
Thank you for your service to our country.   

I was deployed with the U.S Army to Camp Sears Korea (110 active duty members on a small base 15km from the DMZ ) for a year, so I know a little of what you are going through. Sometimes you have a lot of time to kill. Personally I would rather spend that time killing Torians instead of being them... Just giving you a hard time hehe.   

I personally like the Yor ability that has been described for DA. I think it is a good thing that each race has its own super ability. Makes the game that much more interesting to me.

The ideas that are flying around here about speed are really good as well.

Limiting 4 engines per hull was a good one, but to take that one step further maybe each hull type could have a limit on engines instead. An example would be a tiny hull has 1, a small 2, a medium 3, and large and above 4. I am sure this idea has been thought of and probably written about before, just thought I would throw it back out there.

Making the movement of ships relevant to galaxy size is also a good idea. Maybe even doing the same thing with the Yor super ability if people find that it is to over powering. Example, on Tiny maps 3 parsecs per turn, on small 4, on medium 6, so on and so forth. I haven't really done the math so I do not know the exact numbers. Just a thought.

The size of the actual troop and cargo components was also a good idea, being the size would end up limiting the space for engines. Maybe reducing the size for the constructor component along with the fore mentioned would off set this and allow for faster construction ships.

I think that all the Ideas above, combined, might put Mr. Frog, where he wanted to be with the speed issue. The speed "cheese" would be limited and those who want to go faster would be fined pretty heavily. Couple this with the what Mr. Frog is talking about implementing, with the cost and size of engines, and the issue would be licked.

As for me, whatever challenges are thrown at me, I will adapt. Leave it alone, or change it, matters not to me.

And god help you if the Yor are between you and your oponent. I can see the Yor being my first target in every game unless they are off to the side of the map or otherwise isolated.

If you target every opponent with a super-ability that pisses you off, you're going to find 9 targets.

There are 2 factors to the "blitz cheese" approach.
First is the speed, which I would really miss on Gigantic maps. Both sides have valid points. I tend to lean toward no speed limit, the greater speeds help play-ability of the larger maps. If you lived in such a galaxy I don't think it unreasonable that a race might figure out how to go that fast.
The second part of this cheese is the attack. Right now, that 50+ speed ship could, in theory, could attack an enemy 50+ times. Another approach would be to limit the ability to attack to once per turn. If you want to attack multiple times, maybe you need to buy a special module/s to allow that, Attack Computer 1, 2, 3 for ex.
Everyone's making good points, but I think the attack component is an important part of this problem.

For god sake everyone needs to stop calling fast ships "cheese". IF the game was correctly balanced, those fast ships wouldn't match up well against whatever ships the AI is using that don't have all those engines.

What would you call exploiting a weakness in the AI? Call it what you will but alot of us will label it 'cheese'. I too would prefer an AI that was capable of dealing with/using faster ships, but appearently that just aint gonna happen.

I'm a believer that the simplest method is most often the best. We dont really need confusing/complex algorithms to calculate hullsize/speed/weight ratios, deminishing returns, or galaxy scaling... Limit the number of engines and be done with it.

So sayeth the ruler of Bathos!

I guess there should be a style guide on how to properly play GC2. Don't build too many stock exchanges, don't build the mind control center, don't use more than 3 engines, don't tech trade, don't wipe out minors, don't use a weapon no one else is, don't use correct defense, don't use eco-starbases .......

Seriously what else can you put on your troop ships ? 1 advanced troop module is usually good enough, all the rest is engines. The way range works, you generally don't need life support, and even if you do, it doesn't take much room.

I'm happy Brad has explained why the AI doesn't use speed, but I don't understand why it's taking so long to deal with the way the game plays out. It's a fundamental aspect of the game, and right now it's way out of balance.

Anyway back to the op, I think the Yor ability is solid. The only problem I can imagine are players as the Yor locking things up early (like building barriers with influence starbases.)

I guess there should be a style guide on how to properly play GC2. Don't build too many stock exchanges, don't build the mind control center, don't use more than 3 engines, don't tech trade, don't wipe out minors, don't use a weapon no one else is, don't use correct defense, don't use eco-starbases .......

This is the crux of the matter. Variations in play style seem to be in serious decline. People *have* left the game because of it. It's unfortunate.

I, frankly, think anyone using a part of the game as it is designed is NOT engaged in true cheese. So building fast ships, Eyes of the Universe, Spin Control, and lots of Stock Exchanges are not cheese. They may make the game easy, and you may want to forgo using them, but that is different. I can think of a number of small changes that would make the game much harder for the human player and no different for the AI...And I am surprised that some of them haven't hit a patch to date, as I suspect I am far from alone in spotting some of these weak spots that can be used to beat the AI over the head.

True cheese, to me, is doing things outside of the designed context of the game. For instance, play out most of a game and then reload a turn 1 game. That is cheese, since you now know where everything is at.

Playing big maps,,my main reason for speed isn't to 'cheeze' the AI but simply cut down the time waiting for ships getting in place.
Generally,,it has little bearing on the combat itself,,as I take extreme care constructing the ships/fleets against the particular opponent,,preferably by outmost abusing whatever tech advantage I have.
Generally,,I'll be quite disappointed if I lose more than half my HP in a single engagement.

That means most of my warships travel in the 17-25 intervall once the Hyperwarp is researched,,while troop transports (who won't enter the combat until the planets and surrounding space are cleared of the enemy anyway),,trade ships and constructors travel at 40-80 since they are one shot deals anyway and thus not worth micromanaging in detail. Aim,,fire and forget

High speed ships also means fewer ships that has to move each turn,,so more time playing and less time waiting for ships to move one square at a time.