Well, I did stick it in a fleet with almost two dozen tiny fighters

And what does

Zomfging

mean??

what does tccs stand for and give me a screenshot of those executors(with stats).
that ship is great.you know there are two other ships like that that were made(without bugs):The sentinal,it was almost the same size as yours and not as fast but with really big guns.it was in a gameplay example.i don't remember but i think it was in the databanks,gameplay examples or you could use this link.

a list of gameplay examples

the second ship was the dominator:it was (maybe)the same size as your impressive paragon but whole lot more effective with other ships.it took on a whole lot more then your incredible(i mean the "incredible") paragon and its armour was its superstrength(weapons were average super-heavy battleship stuff.nowhere near yours.you should check 'em out. Oh yeah, I saw another great ship and I think it could outclass yours its called the "blue whale" cuz it was built by some altarian loving guy.(not me,sorry to say)there was another but it was just a heavy battleship. BUT MAN, IT LOOKED SOOOOO COOL!!!it was the Night Hawk.I forgot where i saw it but i named my profile after it(see my name)(sorry again but I didn't build that either)my ships are standard heavy battle cruisers or just eye-candy (fast) frigates. My largest and baddest ship was the Greyhound-class heavy Battleship
and my most beautiful (yet formiddable) creation: Black shark-class Man'o'War. All beams,guns,armour and sheilds for this good lookin' bad boy.It was almost as powerful as the Greyhound but smaller and slower. I built the Black shark after the night hawk. they looked similar but mine was better and armed to the teeth(get it shark,teeth).

I think the executor is better(though ugly)

Hey,
If you look carefully at the first screenshot after the stats it looks like a giant hamster laying on its stomach with a smiley face and its hands on its chin like a kid watching tv.      

Hey, If you look carefully at the first screenshot after the stats it looks like a giant hamster laying on its stomach with a smiley face and its hands on its chin like a kid watching tv.

I lold.

While it makes sense to sometimes place multiple types of defenses on your ships, it is best to stick with only one weapon type. Different defenses will combine in defending against an attack. Only weapons of the same type are combined into an attack; each weapon type is a separate attack against the target's combined defenses.

I never have only a single-weapon armed vessel(unless in the very early game in special circumstances), and only arm my flagships with three different systems.

Interesting. That's what I'd like to do, but it rarely turns out to be the most effective option for me (I think). Is it worth giving up the extra damage you get by specializing in something the AI doesn't have as much defense for?

Black holes fired in missiles seems really stupid. I mean how in the universe can you fire a stinkin' black hole in a missile. And wouldn't the ship that fired the black hole be sucked up, As well as creating a black hole that poses danger to any ships coming close to it. The logical ultimate weapon would be anti-matter.

Whatever

What is the tech prequisite for Mini-fighters??

Fully agree with fuzzy, 1 weapon specialization is better, just make 3 ships with the 3 diferent weapons, and spread out the defenses to the 3 armor, PD, and shields. best way to do it. unless you dont want to spend the additional 3-5 minutes putting the 3 diferent weapons, in that case its your personal opinion...


Monc34