LordCarlos

i'm not aware of the new voting format. you guys can go on without my vote. i'll try to go back and read it on monday. sorry.

I guess i'm a little late to the conversation. I agree with councilor qrtxian in almost all points. Every trade option seems alright. The trade options with the Iconians seem resonable. Other than this i do not see what more can i add. (Wow , an underwhelming return XD)

YEESS, i just finished my finals today and i passed. Ok now im back in full force for this. i'll be posting tonigh or tomorow morning.

I agree with Noctilucus, we could defend the minor races. we don't have to do it openly though.

Thank you very much for understanding. I'm just clumsy like that sometimes.

OMG. First of all i want to say how sorry i am to have left without saying anything. I went for a 1 month vacation where i thought i would have internet, i didnt. By the time i came back, i had forgotten about this completly. Im really sorry. I request to be part of the council again. I hope you guys can forgive me.

 Research Xeno Entertainment: 1, 1, 1,1 Basic Miniaturization: 2, 2, 2,2 Signed: qrtxian, noctilucus, SarcFa <strong

[quote who="SarcFa00-_-" reply="184" id="2830841"]Everyone, Although I am somewhat troubled by the Thalans rapid colonizing, it would seem that other major races on the other side of the map are giving the Thalans a run for the most colonies, so I am not all too concerned with only the Thalans. To beat the other races to colonies we need faster colony ships, and to have faster colony ships we need more engines on them, therefore to help with this I suggest that we resear

[quote who="Tolmekian" reply="92" id="2828018"]Little question for y'all: Does it matter what worlds I give the unique names to? I mean, is it going to hurt your feelings if your name goes to some small world? I ask because I imagine some might like their worlds to be large, powerful, and/or important. Otherwise I'll just distribute the names to our core worlds as we claim them. PS - two more councilors to go! [/quote] &nb

[quote who="qrtxian" reply="88" id="2827290"]Second note: I don't want to clutter up the voting with more commentary, but I felt I should note that in Twilight, trade routes do not increase in value over time - a change from the earlier games. Hence, contrary to what LordCarlos says a trade route isn't as much of a long-term investment as, say, a treaty.[/quote] Jus shows how long it's been since i played, i would write an apoligy in the main channel but it's not worth it i

Research Sub-Space Drive: 1, 1, 2, 2, 8 Xeno Engineering: 6, 8, 1, 1, 1 Space Weapons: 5, 4, 4, 3, 7 Interstellar Republic: 2, 2, 5, 5, 2 Soil Enhancement: 8, 7, 8, 8, 6 Diplomatic Relations: 7, 5, 7, 4, 4 Advanced Computing: 4, 6, 3, 6, 5 T

I feel bad about this but i think this party has no purpose anymore, i think all the councilors are pretty much on the same page. So i was thinking on declaring a dormant status on the party until some megalomaniacal bully wants to mess with the prosperity of the initiative. I want to hear what you guys think though?, do you think i should still make reports each time a new ballot comes in?

Hello fellow councilors, it's been a long time since i've spoke before the council, i hope i'm not rusty. First let me address those issues i don't wish to be detailed about: The detention of the scientist on DS17, i do not have any particular thoughts, but i would appreciate other councilors to refrain from condemning this actions, as if the council ever gave explicit instructions about how to deal with this situations. Also i do not want to go int

Development Construction of Stellar Forge on Fortuna FOR: TMS2224, SarcFa, LordCarlos Construction of Orbital Command Center on Fortuna (provisional) FOR: TMS2224 Construction of Galactic Bazaar on Fortuna FOR: TMS

I want to say i'm sorry for the abscense, i had some tests this past couple of weeks, i should be more active now.

I don't know if this should go here, just wanted to say, i've been busy with test, they end this week so i'll be more active after that.

Research: Andimus Proposal (Prioritize research of Xeno Biology and Xeno Medicine) FOR: Noctilucus, LordCarlos Qrtxian Proposal (Prioritize research of Universal Translator and Sensors I FOR: qrtxian Development and Colonization (All proposals are not mutually exclusive) Construction of Trade Centers on our colonies FOR: qrtxian, Noctilucus, LordCarlos Tr

So i'm basicly doing this to keep this thread alive for future votes. Right now i don't think this party has any specific vote that it needs to back, specially since Mater123wr seems to have taken an extended vacation and his party no longer seems to be proposing mad bills.

I second Councilor qrtxian's research proposal.

When the time comes and full scale develpment of planets start, i would like to present a plan for develpment, but for now i would like to clarify my postion on trade centers on all colonies. I do understand we don't want trade centers on planets of very low quality, but this is how i see things. We are going to spend some time running a deficit, what better way to run the deficit than to invest on economy. I would like to see a trade center on every planet even if later on well have

Hello Commander, Staff Members and fellow Councilors. I need to commend the commander on his colonization efforts, you re doing a great job. The decision to build a constructor was spot on and i hope you and your team can keep making this fast and decisive decisions without the meddling of the council. I hope we no longer have to discuss or vote on this issue since the commander and the staff members are doing

In the end i think the council is going to be the one putting the big mayority of the ideas in the ballot, so i think a small summary (maybe a little bigguer than the last one) is necesary but not mandatory.

[quote who="qrtxian" reply="29" id="2806458"] Quoting LordCarlos, reply 28So tolmekian, you see that small summary from the commander at the end?, i think thats exactly what we need to keep the propositions of the staff clear. Agreed although it should probably be expanded a little, for instance bolding actual proposals to distinguish them from background information. Speaking of which, I think out-of-character posts explaining your reasons for a proposal should still go

So tolmekian, you see that small summary from the commander at the end?, i think thats exactly what we need to keep the propositions of the staff clear.

Sorry that i didn't speak before about this issue councilors but counting or recording the "FOR" votes only on the bills is not a good practice. There is one single problem that makes this system useless. How can we differentiate people that didn't vote for the bill, from people that were afk during the voting process?t. If you want to vote against, the councilor just needs to do nothing. Than how can we diferentiate those councilors from people that simply wasen't here.</p