Never!! I want blood (well, not literally). I wll never accept tech or influence or other pathetic victory (no offense to non conquest lovers). I want to make those aliens beg and cry under my feet (eventhough now it's me that's crying. So sad.)
LTJim: You said that there's a Manu guy that know the strat against suicidal. You have the link? thanks. Btw, I just played this scenario again, but by building all trade centres in all of my world. The result : I'm WIPED OUT. This technique did prevent my econ from being halted. But even after purchasing only the hull and later upgrading it into colony ship (I sprout 1 colony ship every 2 weeks --> 1 week for empty hull, 1 week for upgrading to colony ship), the AIs have t
I'm playing Dark Avatar, but not the campaign. I have a question; assume that I have 3 planets: A --> 10 shields, 15 hammers and 30 flasks B --> 5 shields, 3 hammers and 7 flasks C --> 2 shields, 1 hammers and 3 flasks If I set my research slider, the number of flasks on every planet will change accordingly. Even when I set research slider at 0, the planet will still produce some research. I'm confused. Anybody know the formula to calcu
So, basically it's impossible to win against suicidal AI by your own strength? you need to incite war between AIs and get their spoils of war?
I have tried many times fighting with suicidal AIs. I set for 9 ultimate AIs in a gigantic galaxy. I maxed out AI's CPU usage and the bonus ability points. The power balance seems waaaaay unfair. I kept rush-buying ships and managed to colonize about 7 planets (actually there are more than 10 planets, but some of them are extreme planets). When I see other races, they've already owned >13 planets. By 22 Oct 2227, my treasury is -2000 from the leases of the rush-bought ships. Any body have
What's the corelation between tax rate and spending rate? when I tried to move about the tax rate slider, the spending amount goes up and down accordingly. I thought that the spending rate is just the percentage of population hired by the empire. if the tax
I see. so basically it's just some bug that the number wasn't updated? but in the inside, the research centres still adds to my research progress.
What I meant about "no difference" was the number of weeks left to complete a research. I was researching Basic Aquatic World Colonization. Before I sold all of my research centres, the number was 22 weeks left. after I sold them all, the number remains the same (22). And the total flasks were 64 and after the sale, 20. This is confusing.
I opened the Colonies Tab in then Civilization Manager tab, and I summed the total flasks of my planets. The number was 64, but when I opened my Finance Management Tab in my Domestic Stats, the research spending was 52. I opened the Research Tab, and the sum of research spending was the same as that stated in the Finance Management Tab (52). So, which one is correct? 65 or 52? Is the number of flasks not related to the number of research spending? And how does the research treaty affect the c
Hi, I just recently played GalCiv 2. I don't play the campaign, just the "New Game". I built many Research Centers (not just Basic Labs) in my planets, yet there's no difference in my research progress. How come? As far as I know, there are several things affecting your research : 1. Research spending 2. Research Treaties 3. Number of research in each of your planets. What's the connection between 1 and 3?
