RS-fx

RS-fx

Joined Member # 3425511
0 Posts 35 Replies 17,721 Reputation

[quote who="Shamgar" reply="19" id="2090788"]I would much rather have as my neighbor someone like you (who is disburbed by the idea of innocent suffering, even in a game) , than someone who thinks it is cool to imagine he is inflicting untold misery on innocent victims ![/quote] Neighbour issues ? [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [quote who="Sotris" reply="16" id="2090411"]You know, it would be great if we had a strategic choice between nuking

98 Replies 247,265 Views

[quote who="jjandrah" reply="1" id="2089678"]Actually, if you stop and think about it, the number of people that suffer violent deaths in this game is pretty staggering. Frigate / cruiser crews, capital crews, colonizer capital crews, civvie structures, tactical structures, starbases, vasari colony starbases. Death of planet-bound colonists by slow poisoning from high-yield nuclear warheads, being sucked into space by the Egg, or slaughtering friends and family in a Revelation-induced panic.<

98 Replies 247,265 Views

Maybe it would appear to you as a ridiculous or displaced comment but the fact is that I don't like nuking planets. Not especially because it means loss of ressources or planets when you are bombed or a painful wait as you have to annihilate a 6000 defended planet but mostly because, well, it is slaughtering civilians and even if it is a game, i feel uneasy about it. So, i have a suggestion : Would it be possible to add a new capacity to siege fregates ? With the classical nuclear att

98 Replies 247,265 Views

Just a question : I have the french version of sins so if i buy entrenchment, is there a french version or at least the english version of entranchment can coexist with the french one of sins vanilla ? I have been looking for that info but i didn't find it out. I have no problem with an english version of entranchment, i just don't want to spend money for a game that can't run with my version of the game because of string issues or whatever evil hidden bug.

83 Replies 116,056 Views

Supreme commander. Just too much a hardcore gamer and a pain to update. The kind of game where you need to put your life into it to master it and have fun. And the defense far more too powerful that crash your units as if it was paper. Big, big disapointment, i am glad to have met SOASE just after !

122 Replies 291,616 Views

Personally, i am a fan or Rise of Nations and the dev had a great idea to avoid spamming (because, you will agree that carriers become overpowerful when they are numerous enough to make big damage in little time). The idea was that the cost of a unit increase each time you build one. So spamming become too expensive and you have to diversify. I think it would work for spam carriers and will make the game far more interesting. For those who think it is an artificial tric

20 Replies 35,511 Views

It may be efficient but i really don't want to ball up my fighters. I love the move of the fighters, their colored trails and the way they go down on a capital ship to give him a hit before escaping the counter fire... fighters ball are just not beautiful. Just imagine if georges lucas would have ball the fighters in star wars ! (yeah, that's stupid, i know, just making a point ! what i love in space battle is that they are so damn impressive)

17 Replies 7,508 Views

Hi, I am french and i purchased Sins in a video game shop. It has been one month that i am playing and as i pretty enjoyed it, i am really looking forward for the entrenchment expansion. The thing is if i buy it online, I am not sure it will work correctly with my french version of sins. If i have the vanilla version in french and all the stuff of entrenchment in english, it's ok for me, i am just affraid that it blows up the whole game or the text and audio me

0 Replies 1,967 Views