Looks like they had you pretty good but got lazy with their portals. Not surprised the favor turned out that way.
SoFFacet
Thats why I said usually. You have to make a judgement in each situation, but what I'm saying is that more often then not the best choice is to be patient, buy currency, dont die, and win later on.
Its usually worth it to accept a temporary disadvantage by buying Currency 1 instead of an item. You'll be behind for a few minutes but you won't die unless you do something stupid, so the worst that will happen is you'll fall a bit behind in war rank. You'll be back in the game and with advantage once the Currency has paid for itself.
There will be DG battles on Cataract too, and the winners of those will still gain the advantage. Again, the primary difference is that they happen later on once people have had a chance to gain some levels and items. Mixing up your map selection is good so you don't get sick of any given one, which is usually my motivation whenever I do in fact play Prison. The other thing I like about it is that there is no health flag that skews DG engagements for whichever team holds it at t
[quote who="Polynomial" reply="21" id="2303436"]I'm saying on Prison with more action than Cataract you need better timing and micro to effectively win a game where there are higher level people playing.[/quote] The action is faster paced in that the team battles start immediately instead of after several minutes of lane farming. That shouldn't lead you to conclude anything about timing or micro.
Why are you posting a build that you haven't played yet?
[quote]Just because some DG's have more win% doesn't mean they are overpowered, maybe just better players use them. I know there are a lot of noobs using rook, that might be the reason rooks % is so low, doesnt mean he is underpowered.[/quote] That argument gets made in a lot of games, but it always runs into the same circular problem. Specifically, good players will tend to pick good DGs is because they feel more effective, so its not some random distr
Thats not my experience. I could have sworn that if the Grasp is cancelled early for any reason, the victim is set free at the same time.
[quote]My premade optimally plays Ere/UB/Sed and this is exactly what we play for in the mid game. [/quote] Strong choices.
[quote]I think UB is in fact the strongest, both by the numbers, and by personal experience. He has the Strongest, most efficient stun in the game. Stunning a Demigod for 2 seconds, while ALSO doing damage to them and draining a bit of health is amazing. It has no casting time, and ticks 2 seconds off of the Cooldown of spit. It is the only instant cast stun in the game (Closest second is boulder roll) and makes him ideal for ganking. He has the best group
[quote]Exactly. I love it when people come around. And the reasonable level of play is the level of play you'd reasonably expect most of your players to play at. Hint: It's not the top 5%[/quote] I don't see how its "coming around," I've made the very same argument in other games for years. Perhaps it didn't get communicated effectively here. The "reasonable" level of play is not the same as perfect play, but nearly synonomous with "high level" play. Also, it
[quote]But yet it's still perfectly counterable. You'd take no damage at all if you just moved out of the way. It's not the game's problem, according to you.[/quote] This is gettnig very tedious, I honestly feel like I'm back on the Guild Wars Guru forums. Anyways: just because something is counterable, doesn't make it balanced. Theres an element of reasonability here. Expecting people to be able to play at a certain level is reasonable. Expecting people to never make a mi
[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="8" id="2302543"] No, No, No, No. If bad players can't counter something that is in fact perfectly counter-able, its not the game's problem. Not true either. Consider a ninth Demigod who had an ability that fired a moderate-speed projectile at an targeted place on the ground while painting a huge bullseye on the spot. This projectile if it hit any Demigod at the target location would kill it instantly. Balanced? Of
[quote who="hipgnosis" reply="1" id="2302465"]It is easily substantiable, it is also however badly written. It's simple, the game must be balanced at all levels of play.[/quote] No, No, No, No . If bad players can't counter something that is in fact perfectly counter-able, its not the game's problem. [quote]Not that better players would be handicapped so that they are on the same tier as a new player, but that any player of similar skill should be at no d
The Sedna is noob for taking Grace 2 that early. And for dying that early. Most of the builds in this thread only have a chance because of the level and money advantage... personally I think it would be better to brainstorm ways of countering something when you are even or behind.
Its amusing that the most incoherent anti-double guy in the thread is accusing someone else of being ignorant. http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf [quote]People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors sugges
The second and third articles are basically just clarifications of the first one, which is why everyone cites it. That article has been up for years and people still post new comments on it, so I think we can forgive him for not answering every single comment after all this time. I personally don't understand why everyone gets hung up on the Akuma example. He even said that he included it on purpose because it was so supportive of his points, so its not like someone has dug up an example that
I think Miya has already posed the argument adaquately. Tactics should be balanced around the maximum reasonable potential of those tactics, otherwise known as the "highest level of play." If a tactic is fair in a game between experts, then it is fair assuming near optimal play from both sides, then it is fair in general. If a tactic is not fair in a game between experts, then it is not fair assuming near optimal play from both sides, then it is not fair in general. Balance cannot be
[quote]Oh really? So a woman who says she's a woman is doing what exactly that men don't do when they say they're men?I've seen guys call women "attention whores" for saying we're women in the first place, but a guy who's mistaken for a woman seems to have no qualms about saying "No, I'm a man." And when men (as in this thread) think it's funny to recycle jokes that are well over a decade old about how there are really no women on the internet, is it really surprising that women who a
[quote]I'm still figuring out how to get my voice on there[/quote] You could replace all the audio with music like the first one. Except with obnoxious audio effects every time I get a kill (I'm always off screen so no one notices). [e digicons]O:)[/e]
[quote]That is total Bullshit. in all seriousness, if you propose that every player undertaking a game of demigod or any other game for that matter should be subject to the opinions of of overly serious twits then you're stupid. Putting people through narrow apertures for success takes the game out of the game, that is, it loses it's fun quality, and loses it's quality of being a game. Having all of the say in the hands of people who don't play at a nominal level of gameplay is preposterous a
You can't hear any of WickedBear's lines during the vent convo, but you hear the beepy sound every time he talks. Considering he does most of the talking, it just sounds weird... I kinda wish he'd post one of the other games that I didn't disconnect in ;p
[quote]Honestly I can't stand girls/women who go out of their way to make it known they are female when playing games online. They are almost as bad as the guys who go crazy over them as if the game is for picking up a date.[/quote] QFT.
bmg50barrett, AmIAnnoyingNow, SoFFacet (All US East)
[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="7" id="2301057"]I remember that terrible terrible article. Hahahah and he even quotes it as his bible.[/quote] Until someone bothers to make a point as to why they think any part of that article is illogical, I'm not going to bother replying further. [quote]My record against teams with 2 of the same DG