woodstock-tc

Hi all, i started over easter a quite big map playing the AI at normal, as i didnt touched the game e for nearly one year. However i found that im doing better than expected, and i would like to raise the AI level of this game to "Tough" without having to restart a new game (i dont really have much time to play, and the game came to an interesting point, where the AI just lacks some "intelligence" (it continues building the same ship setup for ages, although all his ships die instan

actually its funny to make a poll in these forums regarding multiplayer. All of the ppl here bought the game knowing of this limitation and beeing able to live with it/not needing it for the one or the other reason. On the other hand i know two of my friends who disregard the game because of the missing multiplayer. Ppl like them are not part of this forum.

Hi all, to your information, i created an unofficial cedega wiki entry regarding the current state of GalCiv2 implementation under Linux. GalCiv2 entry please feel free to add your own findings and track changes to the playability.

I understand your points. The best cooperation out there with the "customer" is to have such a persuading product like you guys created. It may have flaws here and there but at the end this is the reason you received so many sales there. I could have also buyed it on ebay or "taken" the game from somewhere else, but already after i read the gamespot review, key points about your CD protection statements i knew that is a game that deserves full support and the add on is already

If i would have bought this game second hand and did not received support i would use my "Rechtschutzversicherung" (Rights assurance) in germany. Its also dealing with the "update" question. Following Law applies: Erschöpfung bei Software; OLG Frankfurt; Urteil vom 3.11.1998; ger. Az.: - 11 U 20/98 Oberlandes Gericht Frankfurt Urteil 1998 Btw in this Case it was Adobe with the Product Pagemaker that was question

As side note: Regarding the "if you dont like it fix it" i have a quite humorous quote from early Mozilla-Firefox days. Still very accurate of course. ;o) In open source software development, the usual reply to any requests, suggestions, or criticisms is the classic refrain: “Where’s the patch!?” This reply is a (sometimes) polite way of saying, if you d

The tech descriptions aren't broken just because you don't like corny/humorous descriptions. That was what the devs chose to do, and if you don't like it you are free to mod it. But again, don't claim that things are broken simply because you disagree with the choice they made. Fully agreed, but a problem may be not that easy to categorize.<

The Tech-descriptions are another weakness in the game. In this category belongs missing general information, using more serious and informative text. (nothing against one joke, but after all this game is no joke or kid-game, so this aspect should not be exagerated) This is also related to the general aspect of User Interaction. While the AI received much attention and brought Artificial actions to a new level, the User Interaction with the game did not. 1) UI cont

Sounds great, and quite difficult to implement. Keep it up, and thanks for the implementation ! greetings from germany, woodstock-tc

np

=== repost with images === (forum software does not allows edit after a reply was done) Dear all, i would like to take the opportunity to add some bugs to this thread in order to help making gc2 even better. Thanks again to stardock for the great game they provided. 1) Research completed. Procedure: If the user selected a technology he was researching using "Tech Tree:MORE" Window (which is the maximized Tech Tree) once a technology is r

Dear all, i would like to take the opportunity to add some bugs to this thread in order to help making gc2 even better. Thanks again to stardock for the great game they provided. 1) Research completed. Procedure: If the user selected a technology he was researching using "Tech Tree:MORE" Window (which is the maximized Tech Tree) once a technology is researched the screen will switch to the Tech Tree to allow the user a Tech selection. Pro

cheers and thanks to stardock for continuous work on improvements making this game even better to spend our after work time on. ASE Test-Department

Hi all, first of all let me thank Stardok for this great game. During the game play i noticed several UI glitches and problems which i would like to present in order to help fixing these kind of issues in the future lifecycle of the game/bugfixing. This Post is only about UI Problems. I found problems belonging in following categories of UI Problems: 1) UI Design : Conceptual misplaced buttons, Background "Decorations" in the same design as buttons, intu

test starbases

Starbases test

thanks for the tips to get some work around done with the enemy starbase. i am quite surprised to not find such option in gc2, as things like this were already present in the diplomatic options of moo2, nearly 10 years ago. (remove fleet from orbit, stop spying, and such if i remember right) so for the expansion this would be definately a good improvement, as it expands the interaction possibilities with the ai. - remove starbase - remove fleet (the gc2 AI tells me

hi thanks for the sugestions. i turned all options regarding battledisplay on, but "show full battles only if fleet vs fleet combat" was not on. i didnt understood it right first. i will check if it is ok now and report tomorrow if i still encounter problems, because as gandron also states, im quite sure that the effect was also sometimes when fleets were involved. regarding attack of planets, do i understand right that a full fleet battle will only be displayed when a

Hi, some emeny AI nation built up an influence starbase right besides a cluster of my planets. If i do this to the AI it will request sooner or later to remove that starbase. How can i request this to the AI as well ? I do not want to trade the starbase, i want to request him to remove it, actually just to have the same option like the ai.

Hi all, i have a very annoying problem using version 1.2. Often when i am attacked or i attack in fleet to fleet combat or single fighters the battle screen is not initiated, but like if we would still have 1985 the battle takes only place on the main map as icons. this is even worser as i dont get any information window and thus can not check how good my ships performed. this is in like 50% of the battles the case. the others are initiated right, it switches to "full batt

shouldnt the 1.3 patch be out this week ? waiting anixously to use it on this WE