i had been using WindowFX without WindowBlinds. today i applied the WB skin StealthOS and now with WindowFX animations turned on, all of my windows are invisible. i had to unload WindowFX. every time i re-loaded it i'd get the same prob and in fact couldn't access the window fx config to turn this option off because the window of course was invisible. i had to use regedit to disable animations. did that, re-loaded WFX. also discover that shadows no lon
Vanilla Ice
i have a suggestion and bugs for WindowFX 3.0 suggestion: the taskbar preview things are neat, but they're not useful for me unless the preview is updated each time i view it instead of just when the window is minimized (eg for checking the status of a download or the progress of a webpage load). i know it's slower to update it each time, but it should be an option. bug: when you use the alt+tab replacement, the program
when i open display properties and click appearence, or open wb config, i get a dialog "select data source" and none of my skins are listed either. i just got a new pc and my guess is i'm misisng some required files or something, i dunno. -edit- found another thread about this: https://www.wincustomize.com/Forums.aspx?ForumID=167&AID=88885 the supposed fix won't work for me. i mean, i can't do it at all, cause i don't have an i386 f
when did i say i don't use WB?... whiplash, i think you're wrong. i don't think if you buy WB you get full Wincustomize access. i could be wrong too, but i don't think i am. oh well, the whole issue is tired now. i'm just curious when the next WB timebomb goes off... cause i know of lots of people who are using a new patch. i'm not, but it's not like the one screw-up has scared me away from patches forever or anything. it will be intere
i wish i made enough profit from my software to afford all of stardocks's apps and a subscription. i think with deviantart, you can d/l all you want, but you can also buy asubscription simply to remove all advertising. i could be wrong, but i think that's how it was last time i was there. my thinking is just this: people have to have lots of readily available skins and themes in order for stardock's programs to have any use, ther
so the 50mb limit is for good? in which case this site isn't really free as claimed before. that's lame. it won't stop me from d/ling, but lame nonetheless. the people who create all of the skins don't charge for them, so i don't think wincustomize should either... and yes, i've contributed a few things which have had several thousand d/ls. i can understand having to pay bills, but i think this site is going about it wrong. you don't see other top-notc
hehe, i used to be able to download as much as i wanted, cause i complained whne they put in the d/l limit and one of the mods uncapped my account, but not no more. gee, i wonder why... of course back then tho it wasn't a hard limit of 50 mb. you just had to wait a couple minutes til the server wasn't busy. i haven't d/led from here in a while so i dind't k
well, the people who had the painting problem can't post the troubleshooting text. at least i wouldn't be able to. maybe it's cause my comp is slow already, but it was so slow with the WB issue i could do nothing. i'd wait for several minutes just for a click or a button press to happen. i did manage to get WB open and looked at it, but i saw nothing peculiar in the text. same as always i think. i really need to take the time and try to fix my com
isn't the overlay when it creates the video on top of everything on the screen, not really even in any window, but just at a certain position on the screen, so that it can paint it faster? is this the same as hardware acceleration? cause i know when i would try to take a screen cap of a video i couldn't do it, cause the video isn't in the window, just overlayed. and one solution is to turn off hardware acceleration. but when i would do that i can't pla
well, the fact that non-piraters don't have the problem is by no means relevant to rather SD could have malicious code inside. but, you're right, if there is bad code in there, someone might look for it. i'd say if it is thre, it will be exposed. i do tend to think SD probably didn't put malicious code in there. i think they may have intended for the software to fail in this way should it be cracked (er, more accurately cracked poorly) but if my proble
probably
what i once did that was funny, is i detected when one of the three different keygens was running, then i used some api to make the name/serial textboxes hidden and added a label in the keygen's window that said it was a virus. make people think they keygen had infected em...
Citizen RingRing, yes, i know it's wrong. that's why i just said people who run those kinds of sites do deserve to be punished. rather that means fines or jailtime i dunno. i think jailtime, if more than a tiny amount, would be harsh, but you are right, they are breaking the law. the end user is too, but it's like marajuana: the govt doesn't go busting into people's houses over pot, there's lots of celebs and others who it's obvious would have som
Apprentice AthleticTrainer1981, what do you mean "get over yourself"? i never said i'm the world's greatest programmer and look at all my great programs. I was just giving my experience of being on the other end of the warez debate, and dealing with my program being pirated constantly. I never said it's even near the same level as WB. in fact, i said maybe i'd feel different if i did have millions in revenue and was trying to protect my software. i can
Regarding the subscription fees, c'mon...$20 for unlimited d/l + some other benefits? Would you run a website that consumes so many resources (bandwidth, employee time, etc) for absolutely free for everyone? Hope your pockets are deep I think a case could be made for your greediness here, as well. Just my $0.02. Cheers! </T
frogboy, you may very well be right. the crack could have been the cause, not some intentional revenge code put in by stardock. i don't know how you programmed the thing so obviously i can't say. but i would think the painting code and the activation code would have to be intertwined fairly well in order for altering one to affect the other. for anyone who is curious about what i program, i'll tell ya. the most warezed one is called Bash HTM
not in my experience. both as a pirate and, like i said, a devoloper. (actually, i take that back, i think maybe three or so people have paid for my software after not being able to use a warez copy. but compare that to the number of people who don't buy and it's insignifigant). but it's obvious none of us are gonna convince the other side of anything, so we might as well give it a rest. i could discuss the topic all day, but i don't think it's suited
if u can't afford things, then u can't have it... unless u steal it... which is what ur doing with warez.. no matter what the reason is... its still not right to use warez.. whether u can or cant afford. if there was a machine that spit out ferrari replicas for free, are you not gonna take one? you c
i didn't ask for tech support. i was just trying to find out if it was stardock putting mailicious code in there. i honestly don't know what to believe tho. i can't say for sure that my Explorer not working is due to WB or the patched Windowblinds either one. i was also deleting a virus i obtained a while back (using SP1 without AV or firewall. i know it's stupid but my computer is too slow to run a bunch of stuff in the background) and some related st
oh, and a fix for this has already been released. people say it does work.
heh, so the patch changed the code that allows it to paint properly. but it waited until now to do it? sorting through 84,000 cracks would be hard. you're right. but only people new to pirating would do that. the millions of others will have no problem. if you can just go to any one warez/crack site and keep an eye on new releases, then you'll see when the better-patched version comes out. or just when you go to a crack DB, download the late
heh, good luck with that one... a search on yahoo for "windowblinds 5" crack shows 84,000 results. if i wanted to d/l it again right now i know of tons of sites i could get it within a minute or so. it's a futile fight. when my software was first warezed i tried sending emails to the warez sites telling them to remove it (a yahoo search for my program shows 15,300 results). of course all of them ignored me. yeah you could hire lawyers and stuff, but th
i have read 60% of all software is pirated. in places like china and other places it's much higher. in the US it's about 50% i think.
btw, as many people know, there are patches for uxtheme.dll to use unsigned xp vidual styles. i use that as well as patched kernels for custom boot screens as well. never had a single problem. it is safe to patch even system files, because you are only modifying the section of the file that you need to. it doesn't affect performance or induce bugs. also, my file that logs the names and ips of people pirating my program is probably like, 700K
aimzzz, you are correct. i did ignore earlier data posted. i just didn't have time to read it. so if it is counter to my claims, then i'll admit i'm wrong. but the impression i get is that is mostly occured on one day. Mr Hsiang-Tai Chien , i don't make a living off of my software. it's just extra income. but harming a pirater's computer will not make me any more money. i understnad that those types of people (which i am a part of) will