rflagg1977

Maybe it's just me, but I think $9 seems like a bit of sticker shock to some. Again, maybe I'm way off here - but it seems like the feeling is "for $9, content must be greater than x" - whereas, I think, if you priced it at $5, and as long as there were at least 2 dozen or so new features, no one would complain or balk at the price. I'd like to throw my hat in the ring as saying what everyone else has said: I'd pay $9 for a decent amount o

I tend to agree that single player should be more focused on. I've dabbled in online random play with FPSes and the like...it really is a crapshoot. Civ 4 though - man, I can't live without playing my partner at home on the LAN, because it's seamless and perfect. But then again, Soren put that in from the very beginning, and really, it was the *main* focus of development for Civ 4, because it was so buggy and half-assed in 3's expansions.