As the Communist bloc continues to diminish, the forces of conservatism in the world are getting ever stronger. The USA, the UK (in a practical if not a party-nominal sense) and Australia are all 'enjoying' arguably their most conservative governments in recent history. The media too are increasingly in the hands of fewer individuals, each with greater influence, and the vast majority of whom are open and fervent adherents of conservative thinking.
Furry Canary
I tip my hat, both to Shane Maloney and to you, Muggaz - excellent post. And if any of you free marketeers out there can explain why these nominally 'private' schools should qualify for even a cent of public money - let alone the disproportionately generous cut of the governmental education purse they currently receive - I for one would be very much obliged.
That isn't what Labor is about. They want free stuff for everyone. That's right FishHead. Labor wants 'free stuff for everyone'. The depth of analysis is quite overwhelming.
Buu: It's also not the first or last time that the U.S. (or any other major country) forced its will onto other nations. True. However, by definition, one country 'forcing its will' on another is totally contrary to the concepts of 'democracy and freedom' you expect to come out of it. <TABLE cellpaddi
i've still got no idea what he's [Latham] on about, with the exception of anti Bush and Howard Well, that's a good start.
From a (possibly) less contentious angle ... one of the greatest Christmas songs of all time ("Do They Know It's Christmas?") Gideon, you need to expand your Yuletide listening. I accept that the Band Aid effort was well intended, but a great song - I think not. (Oh, and the answer to the question in
No doubt it's all part of Howard's masterful election strategy. Lawrence Springborg uses much the same approach in the Queensland parliament, viz. 'No, I've no idea what Mr. Beattie said about this particular issue, but I can tell you this, what he said was totally outrageous, and he should apologise to every single Queenslander immediately.' What I have trouble coming to grips with is that Howard today (I think) declared that the for
Furry and Socialist aren't running around setting up public sites are they? Well, I can't speak for Champas, but no - I'm not. And that proves the case for Capitalism how exactly, Draginol? <TD class="mb
It amazes me that the Conservatives are still trying to portray the Australian Labor Party as a bunch of Commies. Absolutely. As a Commie, I find it the very idea of being lumped in with the ALP deeply offensive.
The only reason why people are able to even post this anti-capitalism content here in the first place is because of capitalism Assuming (for the moment) that this is true ... Capitalism is the predominant system. Some of us disagree with it. However, for the time being at least, we still have to
Vanstone has the best explanation that I've seen as to how things work. Buu, I can only assume that this - like your recent posting about being willing to sell your vote for sex - is intended to be satirical. Otherwise we're ALL screwed.
Good for you, Champas - that shook them out of their reverie! (The woodwork squeaks ... ) It's always ironic when someone sits back talking about the evils of capitalism on their personal computer that transmits their complaints all over the world via the Internet to milliosn of others who are also reading it on their
Call me a pedant if you must, but the quote is "Freedom IS just another word for nothing LEFT to lose", and while Janis Joplin (among others) certainly sang it, it was written by Kris Kristofferson.
It wasn't meant to be taken seriously. Apologies Champas - I hadn't realised you were being facetious. (Climbs down off high horse.) Yes, Sir Keith was a very scary character. Even standing next to Maggie, who was pretty frightening on her own. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=
Furry points out I am reluctant to express an opinion Not quite fair, Champas - I was having a wee dig at a number of the preceding contributions, not singling you out. (And you did proclaim your lack of opinion yourself at the end of your original article.) Also, I apologise if you feel I stole anythin
Muggaz, I know what you mean. If you can handle the analogy, John Lennon once said something similar about the Beatles, along these lines: 'I can say I hate the ****ing Beatles, but when I hear Mick Jagger saying it, that's fighting talk.' The journalist John Pilger gets a lot of flak for being supposedly un-Australian, because he is critical of things done and said in the name of the country. However, I remember a great review of his book 'A
Hi Muggaz. I am not 'anally retentive', I am not 'a disgruntled New Zealander', I am not 'Australian hating', and nothing I've written here is intended 'to bait Aussies'. As it happens, I am an Australian. I guess I just don't see things the way you do. Sorry if I hit a sensitive nerve.
If you aren't an Aussie, then I dont know what you are doing here That says it all, 'mate'.
You can be white, black, yellow or brown... just as long as you are PROUD! Does it matter what you are proud OF?
The more other countries are like the US, the better. I see outsourcing as a way of homogenizing the world. The news suggests this approach seems to be working rather better than invasion and occupation ...
You don't have to be "White" to be an Aussie That'll be good news for the Aboriginal people then ...
quote]My Asian next door neigbour is as Aussie as me So why do you say 'Asian'?
but the truth is, and we all know it : we ARE better! Hmm. Let's think about this for a minute, Teegstar. 1) 'Better' at what - cricket / gridiron / beer-drinking / petrol consumption / treatment of asylum seekers / adherence to the Kyoto protocol / foreign aid / indigenous rights? Or physical