Frogboy Frogboy

Myths & Facts about WindowBlinds

Myths & Facts about WindowBlinds

Myths & Facts about WindowBlinds

Because WindowBlinds has been out now for half a decade and it has changed so dramatically over the years, there are a lot of misconceptions about how WindowBlinds works.

MYTH: WindowBlinds is a memory hog.

FACT:  No. WindowBlinds not only uses very little memory but it actually uses LESS memory than the bundled themes do. That's because WindowBlinds visual styles are designed to use less memory since its skin format was designed during the days when users had fewer resources.

The Wbload.exe process in the Windows task list.

 

MYTH: WindowBlinds will slow down your computer.

FACT: To a certain extent, anything you load onto your machine will slow it down by some amount. The question is, will a given program slow down your computer noticeably. In WindowBlinds' case, it shouldn't slow down your computer. Thanks to hardware acceleration and using extra video RAM on most new cards, WindowBlinds should be noticeably faster than using the bundled themes in Windows XP.

MYTH: WindowBlinds isn't as compatible or will crash my programs

FACT: WindowBlinds, because it's a commercial product, has to provide additional value over the included themes in Windows XP. One of the ways it does this is by defaulting to skinning non-theme aware programs. Of course, some programs just don't like being skinned. Those apps can be added to the exclusion list. Most existing software is excluded by Microsoft's theme engine. But you can do the same thing with WindowBlinds if you are concerned about compatibility over consistency:

You can tell WindowBlinds to only skin theme aware programs and have identical compatibility to Windows XP's bundled themes.

 

MYTH: All the WindowBlinds visual styles are big and ugly.

FACT: There are thousands of WindowBlinds visual styles on the net. And it can also import in .msstyles files if you have SkinStudio installed. Because WindowBlinds is very flexible, skinners tend to make skins that they want to make with little limitation. So that creates more variety. But sites such as WinCustomize.com do have ways of filtering visual styles so you can find the ones you want.

For example, if you want to see the Admin picks of WindowBlinds visual styles, you can go here. That doesn't mean you'll like what they picked but they are skins that other people have liked.

30,424 views 69 replies
Reply #51 Top
Maxness what kind of image where you trying to make with 90 layers.I am just in the stages of getting to grips with Photoshop CS and I dont think I have used more than 10 layers... Dont think I would like to manage more than that yet lol


My latest desktop theme in its development stage currently consists of a single photoshop document with 293 layers organised into 14 nested layer sets



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #52 Top
Owww....thats incredible....gotta be running some elite hardware for that kinda work.
Reply #53 Top
How WindowBlinds works isn't a state secret and it's easily uninstalled. In fact, you can turn it off any time you want.

When you install WindowBlinds it typically goes into your c:\program files\stardock\object desktop\windowblinds directory.

It is set to run on start-up but you can turn it off when you choose. When wbload.exe is loaded, it simply tells Windows to let wblind.dll take care of your GUI element painting instead of uxtheme.dll. There's no dark magic involved. No messing around with your registry. And if you decide you don't want to use it, you can uninstall it just like any other program.



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #54 Top

Here's one for you. This is WB running my Cirrus skin. Go drool...

Reply #55 Top
Very good thread Frog.... I have recommended Stardock's products to alot of people since I just started using it again a week ago. I had tried it back in 97' or 98' but thought the programs were pretty buggy. Heck now I am running litteraly 30 apps between the taskbar and sys tray (not to mention the background services, etc.), have uninstalled a few apps, installed several apps, and havn't rebooted in 5 DAYS! and I am running DesktopX, CursorX, WindowsBlinds & more to come - I would like to see Windows ME do that! SP2 seems to make XP run smoother and more stable as well, at least for me. Besides if the people would actually think that with todays common 128mb and 256mbb graphics cards paired /w 1GIG or more of ram in most machines in use, I would accept a 5% decrease in performance just to have a good looking Windows (which obviously you don't have to sacrafice /w these products). Norton 2003 has a system slowdown of 10%. So to the people that think these WindowBlinds, DesktopX, etc. apps are resource hogs.... do you use Norton? cause your already behind the game by 10% not to mention all the people that don't scan for spyware (switch to Pc-Cillin 2004

I am a tweaker and I think Stardock's programs are stable, cool, and resource friendly. AWESOME PRODUCT STARDOCK & VERY FRUITFUL WEBSITE WINCUSTOMIZE! Kudos
Reply #56 Top
Can't agree more, coastalcarolina. I'm running quite a few different apps, some of which I am fairly sure are memory hogs, and it's just all fun and games. WindowBlinds, WindowFX with tons of transitions (often even switched off the "small windows only" toggle), DesktopX, SysMetrix, lots of other apps... everything nice and fast. If I play power-hungry games I simply turn off most of that - and voila, nice speedy system.

As a previous post said - occasional clean re-installs help too. Kinda sad though.
Reply #57 Top

As a previous post said - occasional clean re-installs help too. Kinda sad though.

That's a fact with or without Stardock products.

Reply #58 Top
A regular format and clean install of the OS partition is a must. I do mine about 3 or 4 times a year, and I format 4 or 5 of my friends HD every year. Formatting and starting clean is a wonderful method for trying to track down a problem /w a program, driver, crashing, freezing, or anything. The only pain is that it is imperative that you look @ all the options and extras being installed for every piece of software because everything has to be customized for usefulness and speed. Which includes getting rid of things in your startup via startup group in all programs, running msconfig and getting rid of unneeded XP services in the backround.

When I format peoples' computers that have had it for a few weeks or months, they are flabbergasted @ the difference. And people that have had a computer for 3 or 4 years and have never formatted... whoa I feel for them.
Reply #59 Top
Old thread but anyway

use wb msot of the time because i like to piff up the dekstop some.

with wb i feel in most cases/skins sluggish compared when not using it very few skins out there feels smoth when using them
regarding to response time.

That has always been the case with wb since the beginning of time regardless what computer you own:)

I suppose if you use xp only for games wb wont hurt you but when you use xp heavly imo it does feel worse with wb on then with it off not tiny diffrence but again imo big.

And having more then 1gb of ram right now feels overkill just to make wb work 100 24/7

haven tried out wb 4.4 yet but i dont hope to much



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #60 Top
like the post, and yea windows skin suxz...

specialy when i use win2kpro and now have winbinds so my pc look like xp but bot the bar down were you have the start button thats the only thing that looks bad. do i d/l desktopx no more deskbar that liik bad..but the window looks asum..
Reply #61 Top
NO - Windows ME replaced 98SE. Then XP replaced ME.


LoL...NO

Windows 95-Windows 98-Windows 98SE-Windows ME-Windows 2000-Windows XP Home/Professional

Sorry if this has already been stated but I don't feel like sorting through 60 something posts...
Reply #62 Top
And actually Windows 2000 and Windows XP utilize the same kernel and to this day many businesses prefer 2000 for it's strengths in networking. It also uses less RAM as there aren't as many background processes running.
Reply #63 Top
Windows 95-Windows 98-Windows 98SE-Windows ME-Windows 2000-Windows XP Home/Professional


lol...NO back at you!

Windows 2000 came out BEFORE Windows ME. ME was basically just a marketing thing to give home users something new to buy. It was 98SE with 2000 icons, DOS hidden better, and the little bit of stability in 98SE stripped away...
Reply #64 Top
Yep, as I recall, 2000 predated ME...but I don't see how this has any bearing on the thread topic...
Reply #66 Top
I finally decided to purchase WindowBlinds because on my one computer I have that can't deal with a memory hog program, I was able to use those pretty themes.
Reply #67 Top
I stopped reading this after the first two "myths". On my computer, I have used WindowBlinds and my computer took forever to boot, and when I finnally got in, I recieved a lot of error messages from incompatabilities with other programs (which is sortof understandable).
I then gave up with this program after a while of frustration and switched to StyleXP. Loads better. In fact, I haven't had a single problem with it. It doesn't even need to be running to skin your computer.

Conclusion: Get a lot of user opinions, and check other programs that do the same thing before writing something like that.
Reply #68 Top

sk8rd ....your problems sound a lot like user error, not Program error....

The reality is that one program is so efficient and professionally handled it is endorsed by the operating system's creator [Microsoft], and the other 'program' requires a 'patched' [hacked] proprietary DLL file to bypass [break] digital signing [copyright] to use unsigned third-party skins/themes.

Your personal perceptions of a program's alleged failings are not backed by the millions of users world-wide who have used the program even long before both XP AND the other 'program' existed....

Reply #69 Top
I understand everything your saying, and I agree that WindowBlinds is a very good program. It is definitely the program that offers the most skinning (everything in Windows is skinnable), but I believe that because of all that it tries to skin, on my computer, with everything else on it, it just can't handle such a great change...it's almost as if it changes my entire OS.
I have a Compaq comuter running 2.53ghz, 512RAM, and XP. This is enough to run XP, and Longhorn on a VirtualPC (I've done it), but can't seem to handle WindowBlinds...I honestly would use WindowBlinds if it didn't seem so unstable on my computer. Perhaps I'm just not picking the right skins?