other than that, i wasn't posting an article commenting on another; i am asking about a comment made on the thread. as far as posting on the other article, what's the point? its author is, in his own humble estimation, the net's foremost arbiter of fact, perfectly omniscient and--unlike mere popes--absolutely infallible.
The point is to debate, but that is multi-syllable, and you just proved my assertion. You can project your inadequacies on me all you want, but the truth is apparent for anyone with an IQ above freezing. I am not the one saying what you think, only what you write, but you are the one trying to do the Karnac imitation and tell everyone one else what others mean. Your quoted paragraph above is a perfect example of your own issues that you project on others. I have bested you in every debate you have slunk out of your slime hole to participate in, and your only rebuttal is to crawl back into your hole.
So crawl back in, I do not expect to see any intelligence coming from you on this issue.
Oh, and for the record
here's a link to the discussion in question
That proves you a liar in your denial of commenting on a thread. You did not link to the comment, but to the "discussion". The only consistency you have is your lying and being wrong. In those 2 areas you are very good.