don't get tanked up. here is a new page

and another three possums were gutted, then thrown to the tesb's which were then thrown to the stants

harpo

i doubt they had them in WWII, else you would speak german. In WWII they had tigers and panthers, but not leopards.

and a tesb gets tanked, but on what?

harpo

tesb is correct Draakjacht

Yeah, he is. Huh, just got my tanks mixed up.

Oh, and even then, we wouldn't be speaking German. The standard German tank was tougher than the standard American tank, but we could build more of them and weren't fighting a war on our own land. Sorry, but Germnay's hesitation to take England and the war with Russia screwed you way before we got into it.

there is no amount of sherman that can beat a modern mbt let alone a leopard.

the discrepancy between a tiger and sherman was great enough but a leopard? that is ridiculous. 

-Exiled Possum 

England was technically hard to take since it was an island and english were protecting their coast very well.

Germany would have succeeded to take england but the loss would have been too important compared to what they gained or so did they think.

England was quite a nice barrier in the end !

-Exiled Possum 

and another two possums were gutted, then thrown to the tesb's, who were then thrown to the stants

harpo

I'm not saying a WWII tank compares to anything after. What I'm saying is that America did not win because of its armor. Our biggest advantage was fighting a war which did not ravage us directly.

As for England, I'm not arguing it would be easy to take, but rather that it was a critical staging point for US forces. Without that, we would be hard pressed to fight a war abroad. And Russia just jacked up German forces.

Understatement. Hitler should have just left them for last. Oh well, good for us.

If it wasn't for his obsession with the Germanic history, he would have been best off leave them out all together. And yes, good for us. Meanwhile, why the images?

Why not.

why ask why?

because!

regarding your post: america did not win because of its armor, that is true, but the idea of germany loosing the war with leopards is just unthinkable. russia would have fallen in a couple of weeks and if you remember that ~80% of german losses were on the eastern front the picture changes rapidly. i also doubt america would have committed any troops in europe with such a technological discrepancy in ground power. england too would have lost egypt very fast and so on and so forth the whole scenario is ridiculous to begin with, so lets stop here.

-Exiled Possum 

you're right, it is ridiculous to compare 60's tech to 40's tech. Hence why it wouldn't happen.

i love it how this thread is still going =P

I prefer mine...

It kind of looks like she's sporting some camel toe.

and one more possum is gutted, then thrown to the tesb's who are then thrown to the stants.

and I also prefer the second pic

harpo

you say that now, but wait a week and she will lay her eggs

-Exiled Possum 

Yewwww ! That's gross ! What are you thinking about ??? LOL

By the way, I think the first picture is sexier ! And more energetic !

Look at the second picture... She just seem out of strenght, her ears down... She looks like she's drunk and will collapse in any second... How sexy is that ???

A drunk woman in a bunny outfit, out of her senses... doesn't sound like a losing combination to me.

well it is eastern in a week isn't it? and she dresses as a bunny? just combine the two

-Exiled Possum