I saw that and decided to abandon the thread myself.  I only banned someone once from my Kzinti Empire thread, and that was Harborne, who had been proven to be cheating on the MV, and was because he was totally unrepentant about having done it.  I dont expect to ever use that functionality again, and I think others should be very wary of using it too.

Sentient species taste better...

Thanks mADDYman.   Any discussion is welcome in the Kzinti Empire thread...and Zyxpsilon is already a member.   As for the competition between the ToE and the Kzinti, it's mainly taunting in good fun.  I call many in the ToE my friends and certainly give Neilo his due for bringing the Tyranny to #2, which is no small feat.  Disagreements happen with friends. and thats allright too.  I dont agree with banning people without great cause, but I think Neilo is of course also entitled to his opinion. 

Sentient species taste better...

I drop all previous comments on the tyranny. as of a second ago neilo and kzin informed me of the relations between them and their empires. Sorry if i offended a few people with my words.

I think it's wonderful how friendly competition exists without causing serious trouble. added a good feeling to the comunity.

Zyxpsilon know you pain me and Nelio got in an argument and know i can't access his threads, and well it was about me help Harborne hacking in to the TOE main website which was not ture. i did not even know he did in till he allready did it.

No.

DA has been said to be EOL for so long that we're lucky we got the spying change backported to it-not to mention that annoying little industrial rounding error fixed that no one but me ever noticed or cared about.

Any changes to DA at this point will be, for lack of a better way to put it, accidental, and that's the sad truth.

The planetary governor is nice in theory but I'd like it to work a bit better in TA before it were backported, if ever.

The same goes for the automation of constructors-we still need the same amount of constructors, so it doesn't really help the system, and this isn't something that's likely to change in TA, either, i.e. for the rest of the lifetime of GC2.

Hopefully there will be a somewhat more useful implementation in GC3, though.

-

In any case the difference is irrelevant.  The person who's in charge of fixing the various MV inconsistencies (to my knowledge, anyway) is not part of the "GC2 team", is probably not even using the same (coding) language, and may not even know the same (coding) language.

It's like asking a firefighter to perform brain surgery on you.

Bad idea.

Just wait, you haven't seen what i have in store for the X-Worlds' Enhanced Espionage system.

Right now - i'm right into the thick of things (very last testing phase) with 1) Three Black Ships 2) Speed & Range Modules 3) Spy base super project which multiplies velocity exponentially for these ships only 4) Looooong range support 5) Sabotage by indirect tricks and, 6) Hidden agendas by ways you can't even imagine -- yet.

Whatever fits in a mod (be it mine or not, btw) can only push the envelope further for coders.

Terraforming is already a blast (in my copy, hi-hi) and since the AIs really took the bait -- Extremes will never be the same to players. Functional & ready, solid variation of context.

Off-Topic - and, **I** don't care.

If the SD i've become aware of has its usual way...

... En anglais svp...
OR
(...In english please...)