Should i go on, really?
DA has been said to be EOL for so long that we're lucky we got the spying change backported to it-not to mention that annoying little industrial rounding error fixed that no one but me ever noticed or cared about.
Any changes to DA at this point will be, for lack of a better way to put it, accidental, and that's the sad truth.
The planetary governor is nice in theory but I'd like it to work a bit better in TA before it were backported, if ever.
The same goes for the automation of constructors-we still need the same amount of constructors, so it doesn't really help the system, and this isn't something that's likely to change in TA, either, i.e. for the rest of the lifetime of GC2.
Hopefully there will be a somewhat more useful implementation in GC3, though.
In any case the difference is irrelevant. The person who's in charge of fixing the various MV inconsistencies (to my knowledge, anyway) is not part of the "GC2 team", is probably not even using the same (coding) language, and may not even know the same (coding) language.
It's like asking a firefighter to perform brain surgery on you.