MarcusCardiff MarcusCardiff

The most dangerous people alive.

▼

The most dangerous people alive.

Just an opinion.

from GalCiv2 Forums
I think these are quite possibly the 5 most dangerous people alive.

By this I think these are the top 5 people that could potentially be the most dangerous to human lives. by global instability, Whether directly or indirectly.

NO SPECIFIC ORDER. Just a list.



George Walker Bush, American President.

Osama bin Laden. Al-Qaeda leader.

Benjamin Netanyahu or Ehud Olmert. Israeli leaders, (I'm not exactly sure who is pulling the Israeli strings)

Kim Jong Il. Korean Dictator

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, Russian President, Soon to be dictator.

This is my opinion, There are some others and hundreds of reasons why.
I cant fill reams of text with those so I am happy with just 5
off-topic
225,747 views 402 replies
Reply #176 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Also, this thread makes my head spin. You guys are talking about every political and religious issue all at once. I have a lot to say, but I honestly don't know where to start. Maybe you should consider making separate threads.
Reply #177 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
"For now we see through a glass darkly, but then all will be clear.."
That's from Corinthians, isn't it? I didn't look up the quote.


thats from the confusas and i wasn't judge and i see how me message can be understanded that way i was just showing a pearl of wisdom
Siege of Centauri
Reply #179 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Get your facts straightened out. 911 is the worst of all the terrorist attacks, the fatalities in Europe due to terrorist bombings is still dwarfed by that incident.[/quote]

That's correct. So we went into Afghanistan after the Taliban and we went into Iraq after Saddam. And, I think, that show of strength and resolve has made them think twice about another attack on US soil.

The Europeans appear to have no determination to combat Islamo-Facists. I'm willing to have somebody tell me different, but I don't see it. They have removed their troops from Iraq because they don't want to "offend" the Muslim states that are supporting terrorism, which makes no sense to me. Are you saying that we were justified in our actions because of the number of civilian deaths, while the smaller number of deaths in London and Madrid do not justify a response? I would say an attack on any of us is an attack on us all.

same thing happened to us in the 70s


Nope. The Iranians stormed the US embassy which was protected by a squad of Marines who never had a chance. The Royal Marines were taken while HMS "Cornwall" stood by and watched and didn't move to intercept or interfere. If this isn't a sign of weakness I'm not sure what is.

I wouldnt be so high and mighty


Show me where another nation is taking action to combat international terrorism and I won't be. The Saudis' protecting their refineries doesn't count - they were protecting their wallets

quote]Maybe you should consider making separate threads.


Come, on, Braddock! Multi-task!

For now we see through a glass darkly, but then all will be clear.."
That's from Corinthians, isn't it? I didn't look up the quote.


thats from the confusas and i wasn't judge and i see how me message can be understanded that way i was just showing a pearl of wisdom


No problem, Greenfrog. I think you are not a native English speaker and you're doing the best you can. And you're actually doing pretty good.



For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to
face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am
known. And now abideth faith, hope, and love, these three; but the
greatest of these is love. (I Cor. 13:9-13)







Reply #180 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to
face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am
known. And now abideth faith, hope, and love, these three; but the
greatest of these is love. (I Cor. 13:9-13)


What it acutaly says in the NIV(new international version) is:

For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.

1 corinthians 13:9-13

think you are not a native English speaker and you're doing the best you can. And you're actually doing pretty good


i am native just really bad at spelling and grammer it's not my best subject i will take that comment as if you were ignorant please do not say such a thing about me again ok.


thank you stormbringer for your correction




Reply #181 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
i will take that comment as if you were ignorant


Sorry, didn't mean to offend. It is just really important that you say exactly what you mean in this kind of discussion. All that we see about you is what you type - no facial expressions, no body language, nothing but words. Those words need to be really accurate.

please do not say such a thing about me


I won't. Sorry.
Reply #182 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

You haven't adressed they issue you lied you gave a half truth that is not kind and you have the boldness to put the bible's name on it! Does that even phase you at all you lied to every person who has seen your post and you avoid it by picking things out of my sentences. How dare you  
Reply #183 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
You haven't adressed they issue you lied you gave a half truth that is not kind and you have the boldness to put the bible's name on it! Does that even phase you at all you lied to every person who has seen your post and you avoid it by picking things out of my sentences. How dare you


huh? Why would anyone lie? It is just a casual discussion, i don't see any motive for lying here. Anyhow, if somone said somthing wrong by mistake, well that happens often enough - usually you would rebuff their mistake with polite discussion not a red coloured insult.
Reply #184 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
you gave a half truth that is not kind and you have the boldness to put the bible's name on it!


chill out dude. try googling "bible "creatures of time"" and see how many sermons and theologies you get - it was a mistake with no harmful consequences. moreover, i think it's a little extreme to be so proprietary about the exact words of the bible -- unless you read Aramaic, that is.
Reply #185 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
i will take that comment as if you were ignorant


Sorry, didn't mean to offend. It is just really important that you say exactly what you mean in this kind of discussion. All that we see about you is what you type - no facial expressions, no body language, nothing but words. Those words need to be really accurate.


please do not say such a thing about me


I won't. Sorry.


huh? Why would anyone lie? It is just a casual discussion, i don't see any motive for lying here. Anyhow, if somone said somthing wrong by mistake, well that happens often enough - usually you would rebuff their mistake with polite discussion not a red coloured insult.


Did you see what he had said to me and i can't answer why anyone would lie because i don't know why they do it and igrance doese not make someone not gulty if you shot some one and didn't knoe any better but still killed them you still get punshed and polite discussion is not always what they post just because it's in white dosen't make nice. People say mean things all the time on these blog i not going to be two faced and put white while im scorning someone it id npt right snd if i put in blue what would have you said?

chill out dude. try googling "bible "creatures of time"" and see how many sermons and theologies you get - it was a mistake with no harmful consequences. moreover, i think it's a little extreme to be so proprietary about the exact words of the bible -- unless you read Aramaic, that is.


Trying puting that into biblegateway.com it doesn't work people preach that it's not really all that there. It was a blantent attempt to quote you can't quote from memory i don't mind parapharsing but that was not paraphrasing my dear pixulate bunny friend(like the pic. where did you get it) What do you mean by reading Aramaic.


No problem, Greenfrog. I think you are not a native English speaker and you're doing the best you can. And you're actually doing pretty good.



please read what he or she wrote not just the last post thank you and please let him answer for himself thank you.
Reply #186 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Did you see what he had said to me and i can't answer why anyone would lie because i don't know why they do it and igrance doese not make someone not gulty if you shot some one and didn't knoe any better but still killed them you still get punshed and polite discussion is not always what they post just because it's in white dosen't make nice. People say mean things all the time on these blog i not going to be two faced and put white while im scorning someone it id npt right snd if i put in blue what would have you said?


I just gave some freindly advice, take it or leave it, it's up to you. However if you are saying that my freindly advice is more deserving for others who posted, well you could be rite, i dunno, can you quote them so i know what your talking about?
Reply #187 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
let him answer for himself thank you.


Greenfrog -

Your posts are often misspelled and poorly punctuated. As a result they can be difficult to interpret correctly.

You haven't adressed they issue you lied you gave a half truth that is not kind and you have the boldness to put the bible's name on it! Does that even phase you at all you lied to every person who has seen your post and you avoid it by picking things out of my sentences. How dare you


Assuming this is directed to me, how did I lie? Where is a half truth? I will be happy to clarify anything I have said, if I can.

When I made a remark about your language skills, I was trying to make the point that any inaccuracies in a post can cause misunderstandings. I think we are seeing that here. We can all tell that I have made you angry, but I don't think we know why. I have already apologized if I offended you. If you just want a flame war, I'm out of here.
Reply #188 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Assuming this is directed to me, how did I lie? Where is a half truth? I will be happy to clarify anything I have said, if I can.


And i thought i was the only one missing somthing?? hehehe oh well.
Reply #189 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to
face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am
known. And now abideth faith, hope, and love, these three; but the
greatest of these is love. (I Cor. 13:9-13)


thats ehat you said
this is what it really says

For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.

1 corinthians 13:9-13
and there your answer:
i don't like flame wars

i checked all the versons it's not on there not even in the nic

Reply #191 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
???? Wow. I think we just found another candidate for this topic of the most dangerous people alive...
Reply #193 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I thought this thread died. Well, there's always tomorrow.

Reply #194 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
thats ehat you said
this is what it really says


We're arguing about Bible quotes?

Wow. I think we just found another candidate for this topic of the most dangerous people alive...


Stormbringer might be right...
Reply #195 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
We're arguing about Bible quotes?


what do you meen your arguing about bible quotes
Reply #196 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
what do you meen your arguing about bible quotes


Sorry, Anubis. GreenFrog and I have had a running debate, and GreenFrog seems to be disputing my quote of a passage from Chronicles. Not quite the thread you expected?
Reply #197 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Trying puting that into biblegateway.com it doesn't work people preach that it's not really all that there. It was a blantent attempt to quote you can't quote from memory i don't mind parapharsing but that was not paraphrasing my dear pixulate bunny friend(like the pic. where did you get it) What do you mean by reading Aramaic.


i checked into it real quick the first time, and i know you're correct. but that's something i've learned to do in general. the point isn't that you're right; the point is that i don't think there was any harm intended in the first place.

the picture is one of Pol's Voice, from the original Legend of Zelda on the old-school 8-bit nintendo. i don't remember exactly where i got the picture because i've been using it as a buddy icon for at least a few years (ever since HORSE the Band released R. Borlax, which has a song of the same name and about the same video game character).

Aramaic was the native language of Jesus and his apostles. biblical historians believe the Gospels as we have them today were derived from two primary source texts, refered to as the Q-source and the J-source (if memory serves), and were probably written in Aramaic or another Semitic language. the 4 gospels were then written (or possibly translated) in Greek, probably the dialect Koine. later, Justinian decreed that only Latin and Greek versions of the bible would be allowed in his empire (and more or less bullied Rome into concession).

disclaimer: i'm recalling what i learned in my introductory classes for my study of religion minor; Abrahamic religions are not my main area of expertise (that was Buddhism and Hinduism).
Reply #198 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Sorry, Anubis. GreenFrog and I have had a running debate, and GreenFrog seems to be disputing my quote of a passage from Chronicles. Not quite the thread you expected?



o ok

Reply #199 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I like the way my post was critisized, well done in being so predictable.

What was the "Cornwall" supposed to do?

Hm? Interception means retaliation in what Iran said was their water, that would classify as an act of war.

And I also like the "God is all powerful" statement.

If he is all powerful, would he be able to create something so powerful it would be more powerful then him. Or say he built a wall nothing could jump over, would he be able to jump over that wall.
Reply #200 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I like the way my post was critisized, well done in being so predictable.


My wife says I'm predictable, too. Oh, well. At least I'm consistent.

What was the "Cornwall" supposed to do?


I would say a shot across the bow and a move to physically intercept would have been a start. Doing nothing at all was the bigger mistake. You will probably say that interception would lead to war, but

Interception means retaliation in what Iran said was their water, that would classify as an act of war.


they were in international waters. Iran doesn't get to claim whatever they want. There are international treaties that govern this.

What Iran wanted was to see how tough a stance Britan would take. And they found out.