MarcusCardiff MarcusCardiff

Iraqi bloodbath,.

Iraqi bloodbath,.

As long as those responsible are no longer in charge.

The west has tried to blame the escalating sectarian murders and impending civil war on the Iraqi peoples, whether it be Sunni against Shia or vice versa. this is a major tragedy that the "freeing" of Iraq should have foreseen.
This tragedy should have been anticipated.
I blame America and Britain.
There will be a massive bloodbath in Iraq. The west can do nothing to stop it now, But we should have never caused it.
Our governmental intransigence has forced this situation to overwhelm Iraq by our unending occupation.
We all know who is to blame. Shame on us for causing this situation.
But most of the shame goes to Blaire and Bush for allowing the situation to escalate further until a time when they mutually leave office.
They won't care then, they are no longer involved.

Or do you think there is another reason why Britain will leave Iraq first, around the time of our elections. then shortly followed by America, Some time later.
Guess which country has it's election first.

Just a hypothesis, never a conspiracy. you need at least 2 for that.
65,071 views 82 replies
Reply #51 Top
Yea i know the media and the democrats keep telling us how unsafe we are now, and how a BIG attack is just around the corner, been hearing that for years now.


Well, the powers that be are busy trying to decide what type of 'event' they would like to unleash on us. I myself believe they're going to use the old 'dirty nuke' scenario, most likely in a shipping port. For you see, once this happens then the inevitable 'police state' will most likely go into full force here in the USA. What better way to take freedom away from the people than disguising it as a 'necessary evil', meant merely to protect our citizens... and us like the stupid sheep that we are will be more than willing to volunteer our freedoms away to the government so that big brother can protect us from the evil and nasty 'terrorists'.
You know what is funny about the definition of the word 'terrorist'? Look it up and read the definition... then look at just about everything Israel has ever done militarily... then look at the majority of what we've done in the past forty years or so with our military and you might find the irony in this.
Reply #52 Top
David ben Gurion declared himself the "father of terrorism". He was a founder of the 1948 Israeli state, which he helped achieve by terrorizing the natives into fleeing the area--a fact which he was actually proud of. We get the word "terrorist" from an Israeli, by his own admission. The term "terrorism", at its roots, actually goes back to 1920's hooliganism perpetrated by Zionists in Palestine, used to run natives out of the area for the purpose of achieving a "Jewish" state in Palestine (I put "Jewish" in quotes because many Jews don't even believe in Israel). This hooliganism was successful.
Reply #53 Top
The USS Cole attacked and damaged with loss of life (act of war, no response from the US),


clinton said we were sorry that the cole was in the way of that bomb boat that is a response

Reply #54 Top
The USS Cole attacked and damaged with loss of life (act of war, no response from the US),


The French tanker "Limberg" was also bombed off the coast of Yemen not long thereafter, on October 5, 2002. This was arguably even bigger than the USS Cole:

CNN Link

This was just days ahead of a key UN Security Council vote, authorizing the use of force against Iraq. Al Qaeda was blamed on the attacks (with no evidence to support that).

Now, do tell: why in the world would Al Qaeda want to attack FRANCE?!?? We all know France was a key swing vote AGAINST the war in Iraq. If Iraq was harboring Al Qaeda (so we're told), why would Al Qaeda want to single out the single nation most responsible for NOT invading their sanctuary???

The American public is the butt of a media con-job, big-time. This attack (similar to the USS Cole) was orchestrated and blamed on Al Qaeda, for the purpose of terrorizing us into war with Iraq.
Reply #56 Top
He was describing the geography of Great Britain in a sarcastic way, making fun of those who use the term Great Britain and England interchangably. England is only a small part of a greater nation comprised of England, Scotland, Whales, and Northern Ireland. So really Great Britain is his country, not England.


Exactly,





dude, your country is England, you wouldn't internationally call yourself by your state/city......and yes, you do sound very uppity with your trying to describe geography in England.....believe it or not, England does exist.....just as the USA does exist, the queen of England, not the queen of Yorkshire.....


I'm from Wales . but what the hell, It's not me that's an idiot.

FYI Wales is still part of The United Kingdom, More commonly know as Great Britain.

We leave off the Great as it intimidates less worldly fools.

PS My use of the word "Idiot" was meant as a observation with regards the intelligence of this post and not as an attempt to belittle any foolish or unthinking person in any way.
Reply #57 Top
PS My use of the word "Idiot" was meant as a observation with regards the intelligence of this post and not as an attempt to belittle any foolish or unthinking person in any way.



yea right


england=england

britian=wells, england, scottland

great britian=britian, northern ireland and at one time ireland

united kingdom=great britian, colonies, and members of the commonwealth

and that is from an idiot in the united states
Reply #58 Top
It is interesting to see people debating the situation in Iraq. My opinion is that America should have given Saddam a pat on the back for invading Quait.

Why is that? For all those who didn't know,, America used to have a military base in Quait and then Quait told America to F off. So what do you do about a freind in need after they tell you to F off? Why you laugh in their face of course! End of story.
Reply #59 Top
If Kuwait had a military base in the middle of Kansas, we'd tell them to f off, too.
Reply #60 Top
If Kuwait had a military base in the middle of Kansas, we'd tell them to f off, too.


Thats fine, and America would certainly have the right to tell Quait to F off, however, after telling Quait to F off would they not be justified in snubbing America if Canada invaded and took over?
Reply #61 Top
we probable had a base there so that iran or iraq wouldn't invade and/or to protect the oil ships in the area

Reply #62 Top
I've now had time to read all the posts here.
Just a couple of comments.

My first one is.

What a shame that America has suffered such a blight in world opinion, I don't blame the American people, I blame the idea that Bush supports, That is America has the right to impose it's values on others and anyone who disagrees is either a traitor or disloyal to the military to an extent that will cause coalition lives.

I say, This is a despotic argument that only a dictator would dare utter.

I think it tragic that a great nation like America has been forced down that road.

Britain, Were seen as the puppet of America an this is equally as tragic because Blaire is far too eager to roll over and have his tummy tickled. Nothing but shame on the "man".


My next thought is to those who believe still that something good can be gained in Iraq, every single fact says this is wrong,
what have we achieved, (fox news aside) nothing. What has happened to the people of Iraq, death, alienation and despair.
the whole notion of democracy is a sham.

To me this whole episode has cast a huge shadow over American and British forign policy that will take many years to rectify.
Even If we change the leaders that think this way we will still be damned in history as meddling fools that cost millions of lives by incompetence and arrogance.

What a legacy for us to bare.

I put one other thought in the works,

If this bullying doesn't stop we could find ourselves in a situation we can't control.
An escalating conflict that could drag in Israel, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, then possibly Russia and China. not to mention doszens of other possible allies on either side.

Hasn't anyone wondered why Bush and Blaire are so reckless with the possibility of another world war.

I know I am alarmed by this, But I'm not a global dictatorship coalition on the warpath

Think of this as you will, It's just another hypothesis.

Reply #63 Top
we probable had a base there so that iran or iraq wouldn't invade and/or to protect the oil ships in the area


Yea probably.

It really ticks me off that America had to miss out on the poetic justice of Quait getting invaded after telling America to F off.

Imagine if the rest of the world had to Push Saddam out without America? No red necked Arab could argue against those western infidels being in the middle East, they would be sucked in and have to cop it sweet.
Reply #64 Top
t really ticks me off that America had to miss out on the poetic justice of Quait getting invaded after telling America to F off.

Imagine if the rest of the world had to Push Saddam out without America? No red necked Arab could argue against those western infidels being in the middle East, they would be sucked in and have to cop it sweet.


You're idea of America seems more like the bar room "Oi Fuk 'ead, You looking at me misses?" approach to world politics

PS, It's kuwait.

Reply #65 Top
You're idea of America seems more like the bar room "Oi Fuk head, Are you you looking at my misses?" approach to world politics


hehehe na, poetic justice is the best kind of justice you can get this side of heavens gates! You let the other guy stumble on their own actions.

spelling noted
Reply #66 Top
these are the sides of the final war before christ returns


on the side of christ is great britian, united states of america, isreal

on the side of the beast is the united nations, russia, china, the muslims, and oh yea the rest of the nations

and the winner will be christ not any of the nations listed above

all of this is in revolations


and as for me i try to do that right thing no matter how many people think it isn't right or that i shouldn't do it becouse it might upset someone

What a shame that America has suffered such a blight in world opinion


people have been burning american flags since i was born becouse of our policies

and still most people still want to come here to live

the whole notion of democracy is a sham.


so you would rather live under castor

If this bullying doesn't stop we could find ourselves in a situation we can't control.


you probable think the palis have the right to attack children in isreal

Reply #67 Top
Where exactly would a red necked Kuwaiti Arab live?
Have you any idea how they might think?
Did you consider that maybe they might even be loyal Americans?
Or are you just an ignorant racist?
Reply #68 Top
all of this is in revolations

Utter nonsense, What a bigoted and truly idiotic view of Christianity.
I bet you even believe in the Rapture.

people have been burning american flags since i was born becouse of our policies


A comedian said " America has finally united the rest of the world, We even have our own flag. It's the same as America's, but ours is on fire"


the whole notion of democracy is a sham.


so you would rather live under castor


Is Cuba near Iraq for you?

you probable think the palis have the right to attack children in isreal


Edit, I guess you mean Palestinian.
I guess you're missing out on Israeli agression then, Like the enforced invasion of their country and shelling of children on a beach

Reply #69 Top
The west has tried to blame the escalating sectarian murders and impending civil war on the Iraqi peoples, whether it be Sunni against Shia or vice versa. this is a major tragedy that the "freeing" of Iraq should have foreseen.
This tragedy should have been anticipated.
I blame America and Britain.
There will be a massive bloodbath in Iraq. The west can do nothing to stop it now, But we should have never caused it.
Our governmental intransigence has forced this situation to overwhelm Iraq by our unending occupation.
We all know who is to blame. Shame on us for causing this situation.
But most of the shame goes to Blaire and Bush for allowing the situation to escalate further until a time when they mutually leave office.
They won't care then, they are no longer involved.

Or do you think there is another reason why Britain will leave Iraq first, around the time of our elections. then shortly followed by America, Some time later.
Guess which country has it's election first.

Just a hypothesis, never a conspiracy. you need at least 2 for that.


Impending, its full scale buddy.

You can blame this on any one person, any other person elected to president would have done the same. The executive branch isnt strong enough anymore, Congress would have decided to send troops to Iraq anyways. The thing is, is that the US is stuborn, and after Vietnam we arent about to give up again.

In the end, and I hate saying this, its them dieing not us, thats the way the world thinks. Yes, the average person feels sorry for that split two or three seconds whenever we hear another soldier dies or another bombing is announced, but it doesnt really stir anyone to action. The only thing that does that is if it actually happens here, to the common citizen. I mean look at how the nation responded to Virginia Tech, how the media broadcasted the violance and the emotional pain. And yet, even through all that people stayed ignorant of places like Somalia and Darfur, and all the other massacres that happen daily, but just arent 'important' enough.

Yes, this war has to end, but its obvious that the politicians arent going to end it for us unless more and more speak out. Over twenty million people demonstrated against the war, and that actual sent a message.
Reply #70 Top
Where exactly would a red necked Kuwaiti Arab live?
Have you any idea how they might think?
Did you consider that maybe they might even be loyal Americans?
Or are you just an ignorant racist?


1) It is not specific to kuwait, and i do not know.
2) I can only comment on what those Arabs say on public record.
3) I never said all arabs were rednecks against america!
4) I am only racist against those who are racist against me!!
Reply #71 Top
MarcusCardiff creates a contraversial post and then flame people, nice going.
Reply #72 Top
you probable think the palis have the right to attack children in isreal


Edit, I guess you mean Palestinian.
I guess you're missing out on Israeli agression then, Like the enforced invasion of their country and shelling of children on a beach


the difference is that the pales are arming their children and isreal isn't


on top of that the pales brave military is hiding behind the children that aren't armed

and the only time i heard how bad that was

was during the last war when one isreali unit did it and it was the isreali government that said it was wrong

and in iraq it is iraqis killing iraqis

20 million french?

there were 20 million french protesting the war when hitler invaded

Reply #73 Top
its them dieing not us


This is just crass stupidity. It's the sort of ignorant bigoted bullying that redneck fools cling to because there too stupid to realise there is a world outside America.

Don't you dare drag me and other countries into your madness. Some peoples don't actually consider America or it's home grown murderers and manage to get a perspective we also manage to make our own minds up with regard to global atrocity.
I bet you would be surprised by your own countrymen if you had a look. Not every American is so inward thinking that they happily ignore the suffering of others.



Reply #74 Top
e difference is that the pales are arming their children and isreal isn't


on top of that the pales brave military is hiding behind the children that aren't armed



I can't comment on this, You are a Racist. I take exception to your use of "pales" and will not comment on your stupidity any further.

Please, are there any mods that will censure this bigot. for his use of blatantly racist terms.

Reply #75 Top
I can't comment on this, You are a Racist. I take exception to your diction and will not comment on your stupidity any further.

Please, are there any mods that will censure this bigot. for his use of blatantly racist terms.


If anyone should be censored then it is you! your the only one making personal attacks.