Frogboy Frogboy

Get your system ready for GalCiv II

Get your system ready for GalCiv II

Avoid pain

We hope you're as excited to play GalCiv II as we are for you to get your hands on it.

So what can you do to make sure you have the best possible experience? Here are some suggestions:

1) If you have an integrated video card and you have a free AGP/PCIE slot, do yourself a favor and get a good video card.  For less than $100 you can get a decent ATI or nVidia video card that will make all your games run much better.  You MUST have at least 32 megs of memory on your video card. If it's a really old (i.e. >3 years) Intel Graphics extreme you may not be able to run the game because it won't support DirectX 9C.

2) If Option #1 isn't available, make sure you have the latest video card DRIVERS.  We're serious about this.  The game uses some fairly new graphic features that only recently are well supported by video drivers. We found during the beta over and over people having some problem and it turning out their video drivers were 2 years old.

3) Make sure your desktop display is running at 32bit color.  To do that, go to control panel, display properties, and choose 32bit.  We found that on some systems running in 16bit color won't run the game (or most other games, we have no idea why).

4) We did a lot of memory optimization to make sure the game runs on pretty low end hardware.  Still, if you're running around with a PC with less than 512MB, see if you can upgrade. The game will still run but it'll be slower.

5) The game will default, if it can, to 4X anti-aliasing so that things look nicer.  But if you have an older video card (a Geforce 5600 is an older video card incidentally) you may want to turn that off, especially if you're watching the video cut scenes or video tutorials (The 3D engine itself works fine). The game runs fine on Geforce 5x, but 4x anti-aliasing may be too much for some of the high resolution cut-scenes YMMV. Most of our testing boxes were this series (or ATI equivs) so don't take what I'm saying here as the game not running well on it.  It's just that 4X anti-aliasing is probably overkill on such a setup.

6) If you have Mcafee anti-virus, be aware that if you have VB script detection on it will give a warning when you run the game the first time. It's not on by default but it's useless anyway (it detects ALL VB Script as "a malicious script").  Our game launcher uses VB Script.

7) The game does not have copy protection but it does come with a serial #.  When the installer asks for it, it's optional but we recommend putting it in because it'll make it easier to get upgrades. Since it's optional, the installer doesn't check for the accuracy so be careful when entering it in (don't worry, there's an easy way to update your serial # if you do make a mistake).  The serial # is only needed to download updates.  That said, PLEASE DO NOT give your CD to others.  We are really trying to avoid putting copy protection on our games and every sale counts.

8) The game takes two CDs to install so you will want to make sure you have enough disk space (two CDs worth).

9) If you pre-ordered from us and plan to download the game, we expect to start letting people preinstall most of the game prior to release (next week) to decrease bandwith needs. We recommend taking advantage of this.

10) If you do run into a problem of some kind, there is a file called debug.err in your GalCiv directory that should tell us a lot of info about what happened.

11) The game will run at any resolution >= 1024x768.  So 1440x1050 or 1600x1200 or 3072x2200, it doesn't matter.  But the game will start at 1024x768.  Go to options and select the resolution you want to play and then reload.

36,250 views 56 replies
Reply #26 Top
ARE YOU SERIOUS!?! I just got my computer upgraded in November with 512MB of RAM, a new 1.4 Ghz processor, and a Nvidia Geforce FX 5200 with approximately 128.0 MB of memory (on just the Geforce). And it is now out of date?

Please tell me that I am mistaken, and that I will have no problem running GC2 in all of its glory (but dont lie)

Frogboy: You can run GalCiv II in all its glory but you may have to turn down the anti-aliasing to view the cut scenes in their full glory. But the GeforceFX 5200 is not a very good card I'm afraid.


I have been running the Beta 5 at 4X anti-aliasing on the same setup without problems, except my CPU is a HyperThreaded 2.8 GHz. I did have issues with the game using lots of memory and game save/restore being very slow but I'm told this is resolved in the Final release.
Reply #27 Top
ARE YOU SERIOUS!?! I just got my computer upgraded in November with 512MB of RAM, a new 1.4 Ghz processor, and a Nvidia Geforce FX 5200 with approximately 128.0 MB of memory (on just the Geforce). And it is now out of date?


No offense but a 5200 is nearly 3 years old. Ancient technology really. Heck, my ATI 9800 Pro is over 2 years old now. Time flies by in this business.

Also I hope you meant a 2.4 ghz processor cause they haven't made 1.4's for a few years now.
Reply #28 Top

Hmm, I'm concerned. My laptop is an 1.4Ghz Pentium-M with 512Mb of RAM, ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 for video, and onboard sound. Civ IV runs OK at the lowest textures; it was unrunnable before the latest patch. How will GalCiv II compare? What kind of options are there to increase performance? Will there be a low-res mode that will make GalCiv II bearable on my machine?

You just described the setup that we demo the game on during media tours.  IBM ThinkPad T40.

Reply #29 Top
Also, how does this game handle on laptops? It's my backup computer and it has a ATI Radeon X200 Xpress. Not exactly the highest end card, but it does play Civ IV at high resolution.


I am running the Gamma test version on a real piece of poo laptop (it is over 2 years old with a video card the only has 16Mb of RAM) and it still runs. I just had to turn down a lot of the graphics settings to make it run smoothly. The game is VERY customizable in the options settings, so you can make configure it to work on older hardware.

That said, I'm excited to start running it on my gaming computer at home (I'm traveling with my laptop right now) so I can see it at higher resolution with all the graphics stuff turned all the way up.
Reply #30 Top
Can AA be forced to disable in the game?

I'll probably be more than fine with an Athlon FX57 running dual 7800GTX's in SLI but here is a question thats been bugging me for the longest time that maybe you can resolve:

Is there a difference between disabling AA in-game and then forcing it on using the driver (for example, to 8x +) versus setting the driver to "application controlled" and using the game to turn on AA (up to 4x or whatever the max is) ????

Is there a quality difference?

Also, anisotropy filtering should be forced on in the driver ?? I haven't heard of anyone mention that option in the game settings.
Reply #31 Top
Can AA be forced to disable in the game?

There is an option that allows to set the AA level (from none to 4X I am correct)
Reply #32 Top
can anyone indiacte how much actual RAM the game needs to run ok? (i've got 512M, but there's an awful lot of services in Windows XP)
Reply #33 Top
can anyone indiacte how much actual RAM the game needs to run ok? (i've got 512M, but there's an awful lot of services in Windows XP)

I have noticed that the Beta 5 gets as high as 600 MB but Brad has said that in the final release it only uses 300 MB with most of that swapped out. I have been running the Beta 5 on 512 MB of RAM. Many of the services that Windows XP runs after a standard install are unnecessary. Not only do they increase boot time, take up RAM, but they also can be a security risk. A few years back there was a virsus that took advantange of a buffer overflow in the Windows Messenger service. I was running Windows 2000 on my previous computer. The patch required installing the service pack 2 for Win2K but that would cause a blue screen because of a jumper setting on my hard drive (to make a large hard drive compatible with an old BIOS that only supported 8GB; I could not find a flash update for the BIOS). It turns out the service was only needed to allow sys.admins to send a message to everyone on the network (e.g., shutting down server XYZ in 5 minutes). Since this was my home computer I just disabled the service and never saw the virus again! There are free PDF files on the Internet you can download that explain each service so that you can decide which services to run and which to disable.
Reply #34 Top
There is an option that allows to set the AA level (from none to 4X I am correct)


Anyone know if there is a difference between enabling in game AA and enabling it in the driver instead?
Reply #35 Top
Anyone know if there is a difference between enabling in game AA and enabling it in the driver instead?


Should be none. If you have the AA level set in the driver, it will override whatever you set in the game. If you have the driver set to "Application preference" or whatnot, then AA will be disabled unless it's specifically enabled in the game settings.
Reply #36 Top
have noticed that the Beta 5 gets as high as 600 MB but Brad has said that in the final release it only uses 300 MB with most of that swapped out.


thanx, paul. that's what i heard too. i s'pose i was hoping for an exact best-case minimum. i'll prob upgrade to 1gb anyways
Reply #37 Top
any idea about performance with the ati x200m/x300 chipset?
lappie would be a msi270 with 1GB Ram and a turion64 MT30 proc.

thank you
Reply #38 Top
So... question on my system:

AMD Athlon 64 3700+ San Diego
1GB SDRAM DDR 400
eVGA Geforce 6800GS PICex16

Whats the biggest bottleneck on it (which means... whats the next thing that needs to get upgraded on it - memory or video)?
Reply #39 Top
Right now you don't need any upgrades.

If you're really sooo desperate to spend money, buy more RAM. You can't have too much RAM
Your video card is quite good, don't go spending green on overpriced 1-month old cards.

I'd save the money and buy upgrades when you need em in a few years.
Reply #40 Top
Right now my only PC is a Dell 9300 with a gig of RAM which I bought trying to convince myself this was going to be a work machine not for gaming but I can't help myself. I did get the "trubright" screen. So I didn't get the upgraded video card. I just preordered the game, am I going to be able to run it? Or should I cancel my order and start crying?
Reply #41 Top
Yeah... I actually just built the system - was wondering what the first thing I would have to throw money into would be (I figured ram). I figured out why my system was working slower than it should have been - needed a BIOS update (went from a 3dmark05 of 3800 to 5100). Unfortunatly ntfs.sys decided to kill itself last night... so my first 'upgrades' will be trying to fix the thing (went to compusa, got a HD... didn't work since with the corrupted HD still plugged in everything just crashes... gonna try an external enclosure to see if I can save it).
Reply #42 Top
Thank you very much for the neat round up of things, Frogboy! I think Stardock has put great effort into making this game as user-friendly as possible (vide the lack of anti-piracy protection). Let me just say that I am one of many grateful game fans out there who really really appreciate and support Stardock for constanly putting out quality stuff... You guys rock and I can't repeat that enough.
Reply #43 Top
Ok gentlemen I'm at the threshold. I have my credit card ready to purchase GalCiv2. However before I make the fateful plunge, I want to display my dxdiag stats for my cpu and see if anyone can tell me it'll work. *fingers crossed*

Processor: Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.20 GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 512 MB RAM
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c
Graphics Card: ATI RADEON X300 (128 MB memory)

Aight there it is. Do I need any other information for you fine people? And as of right now I can't really afford any upgrades. Thanx and heres hoping I become a satisfied customer of Stardock.
Reply #44 Top
How well would GalCiv2 run on a T30 Thinkpad?
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 Mobile CPU 1.8 GHz
Memory: 768 MB RAM (normal T30s are 256, I upgraded)
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon 7500 Mobility

This computer is almost 4 years old, and almost no new games support running on this. (I'll get a new computer, eventually... probably when this one's a smoking heap.)
Reply #46 Top
Right now my only PC is a Dell 9300 with a gig of RAM which I bought trying to convince myself this was going to be a work machine not for gaming but I can't help myself. I did get the "trubright" screen. So I didn't get the upgraded video card. I just preordered the game, am I going to be able to run it? Or should I cancel my order and start crying?

What video card? I can't find the default one -- it looks like it may be the X300 (in which case you're likely fine), but I have no idea. It's not on Dell's site any longer.

Ok gentlemen I'm at the threshold. I have my credit card ready to purchase GalCiv2. However before I make the fateful plunge, I want to display my dxdiag stats for my cpu and see if anyone can tell me it'll work. *fingers crossed*

Processor: Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.20 GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 512 MB RAM
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c
Graphics Card: ATI RADEON X300 (128 MB memory)

That X300 is going to be a big bottleneck. Despite that, this game should run. It runs on a Geforce 2 or 3, the X300 should be more than fine, even if the graphics aren't cranked (it's a strategy game, that isn't a huge loss).

How well would GalCiv2 run on a T30 Thinkpad?

Not well, if at all. That 7500 mobile is maybe comparable to the Geforce 2. GF2s have been tested to work with the game on desktop computers, but laptops are naturally fickle.

NVIDIA GeForce Ti 4600

Ok, besides the anti-aliasing. Yes or No?

You really havn't given much but if the rest of your system is good: yes.
Reply #48 Top
I already preorded GalCiv 2 because I like what ive been reading about it but will I be able to play it with my current system or do I need to wait til I can get an upgrade to my video card?

Pentium 4 1.9 ghz
512 mb
Geforce 2 MX 100/200
Reply #49 Top
Your system will run it fine.
Reply #50 Top
Hi all,

I have a question about graphics performance with the Radeon X300 video card. That is the card I have as well. Can someone explain to me what sort of graphics hit I will be taking - I am trying to get a sense of the qualiative difference (trying to figure out if I should shell out some $$ for a new video card or not)